Evaporation Water Loss
Do you know of any papers or charts that give water evaporation rates? We have an opportunity to reduce our cleaner tank temperature from 180 to 80°F and want to know how much water we can save.
Q: Do you know of any papers or charts that give water evaporation rates? We have an opportunity to reduce our cleaner tank temperature from 180 to 80°F and want to know how much water we can save. R. T.
A: R.T., that’s an interesting question, because I am an environmental engineer, not a mechanical/process engineer. But I do have two sources.
In an old U.S. EPA publication “Summary Report: Control and Treatment Technology for the Metal Finishing Industry, In-Plant Changes” (EPA 625/8-82-008), published in 1982, Figure 5 shows “surface evaporation rate from plating baths with no aeration” assuming “ambient conditions at 75°F, 75% relative humidity, plating solution is 95% mole fraction H2O.” At 80°F, the water evaporation rate is estimated at 0.017 gal/hr/ft2, while at 180°F the water evaporation rate is estimated at 0.3 gal/hr/ft2, an increase of almost 18 times.
If my memory serves me correctly, it takes about 8,500 BTU to evaporate a gallon of water; considering inefficiencies of energy transfers, one can easily input 9,500 BTU of energy in order to obtain 8,500 BTU for actual evaporation. In terms of dollars, your energy savings will be much larger than water savings; by reducing your bath temperature from 180 to 80°F your energy savings due to evaporation alone (not considering losses through tank walls and parts) is 2700 BTU/hr/ ft2 ((0.3 - 0.17) x9500). For a small 10-ft2 tank, that is 27,000 BTU/hr and 648,000 BTU/day. Assuming you are heating with natural gas at a cost of $1/therm (100,000 BTU/therm), your savings for a 10-ft2 tank could be about $6.50 per day; that’s about $1,700 per year with five days per week production.
I also found an old article by M.D. Syed, Ph.D. and D.G. Strang, P.E., of D.W. Thomson Consultants Ltd. in an unknown publication that gave the following two equations that we have used over the years to estimate emissions of various volatile chemicals from open-top tanks:
W1 = ((95 + 0.425V) ? (Pw - Pa ) ? A)/L
and
W2 = ((201 + 0.88V) ? (Pw - Pa ) ? A)/L
where
W1 = Rate of water evaporation with parallel air flow (lb/hr),
W2 = Rate of water evaporation with transverse air flow (lb/hr),
A = Open tank surface area (square feet),
V = Air velocity over the water surface (ft/min),
L = Latent heat of evaporation (BTU/lb),
Pw = Vapor pressure taken at the temperature of the water, that is saturation pressure (inches of mercury),
Pa = Vapor pressure of moisture in the air at room temperature and relative humidity, that is partial pressure (inches of mercury).
I am sure our readers have other sources they can share as well.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #121: Development of a Sustainability Metrics System and a Technical Solution Method for Sustainable Metal Finishing - 15th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the twelfth quarter of project work (October-December 2023) at Wayne State University in Detroit. In this period, our main effort focused on the development of a set of Digital Twins (DTs) using the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) technology with application on parts rinsing simulation.
-
Hubbard-Hall Acquires BioConversion Technology
The acquisition adds experience and biologics to the AquaPure product line.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.