Evaporation Water Loss
Do you know of any papers or charts that give water evaporation rates? We have an opportunity to reduce our cleaner tank temperature from 180 to 80°F and want to know how much water we can save.
Q: Do you know of any papers or charts that give water evaporation rates? We have an opportunity to reduce our cleaner tank temperature from 180 to 80°F and want to know how much water we can save. R. T.
A: R.T., that’s an interesting question, because I am an environmental engineer, not a mechanical/process engineer. But I do have two sources.
In an old U.S. EPA publication “Summary Report: Control and Treatment Technology for the Metal Finishing Industry, In-Plant Changes” (EPA 625/8-82-008), published in 1982, Figure 5 shows “surface evaporation rate from plating baths with no aeration” assuming “ambient conditions at 75°F, 75% relative humidity, plating solution is 95% mole fraction H2O.” At 80°F, the water evaporation rate is estimated at 0.017 gal/hr/ft2, while at 180°F the water evaporation rate is estimated at 0.3 gal/hr/ft2, an increase of almost 18 times.
If my memory serves me correctly, it takes about 8,500 BTU to evaporate a gallon of water; considering inefficiencies of energy transfers, one can easily input 9,500 BTU of energy in order to obtain 8,500 BTU for actual evaporation. In terms of dollars, your energy savings will be much larger than water savings; by reducing your bath temperature from 180 to 80°F your energy savings due to evaporation alone (not considering losses through tank walls and parts) is 2700 BTU/hr/ ft2 ((0.3 - 0.17) x9500). For a small 10-ft2 tank, that is 27,000 BTU/hr and 648,000 BTU/day. Assuming you are heating with natural gas at a cost of $1/therm (100,000 BTU/therm), your savings for a 10-ft2 tank could be about $6.50 per day; that’s about $1,700 per year with five days per week production.
I also found an old article by M.D. Syed, Ph.D. and D.G. Strang, P.E., of D.W. Thomson Consultants Ltd. in an unknown publication that gave the following two equations that we have used over the years to estimate emissions of various volatile chemicals from open-top tanks:
W1 = ((95 + 0.425V) ? (Pw - Pa ) ? A)/L
and
W2 = ((201 + 0.88V) ? (Pw - Pa ) ? A)/L
where
W1 = Rate of water evaporation with parallel air flow (lb/hr),
W2 = Rate of water evaporation with transverse air flow (lb/hr),
A = Open tank surface area (square feet),
V = Air velocity over the water surface (ft/min),
L = Latent heat of evaporation (BTU/lb),
Pw = Vapor pressure taken at the temperature of the water, that is saturation pressure (inches of mercury),
Pa = Vapor pressure of moisture in the air at room temperature and relative humidity, that is partial pressure (inches of mercury).
I am sure our readers have other sources they can share as well.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters - April 2022-March 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers project work from April 2022 to March 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The overall objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Initial results for the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts are discussed.
-
Hubbard-Hall Acquires BioConversion Technology
The acquisition adds experience and biologics to the AquaPure product line.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 6th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation. This sixth quarter report covers the continued assessment of eight perfluoroalkyl acids PFAAs most commonly found in wastewaters, by electro-oxidation with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode across a range of anodic potentials in solutions, exploring the reaction mechanisms. To summarize, the PFAAs start to exhibit degradation behavior when the anodic potential reaches a level where water oxidation occurs, suggesting that the hydroxyl free radicals generated via water oxidation play a role in PFAA degradation.