Measuring Thick Nickel on Aluminum or Steel
XRF is the go-to instrument for measuring electrolytic and electroless nickel coating thicknesses, however the technology does have limitations when it comes to measuring thick coatings. This helpful Ask the Expert article from Rob Weber of Fischer Technology explores several alternative methods.
Q: I often need to plate thick electrolytic and electroless nickel on steel and aluminum. We want to use our XRF for these measurements. However, on aluminum we struggle to get accurate and consistent readings above 1–1.2 mil (1,000–1,200 µ”, 25–30 µm). On steel we start seeing difficulties above 1.4 mil (1,400 µ”, 35 µm). Are there any other test methods for measuring thick nickel plating?
A: Over the past decades, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) has become the go-to instrument for measuring electrolytic and electroless nickel coating thicknesses. Measurement with XRF is fast, nondestructive, accurate and repeatable. However, as you have seen, XRF does have limitations when it comes to measuring thick coatings. There is a maximum thickness of material XRF can “see through” and get reliable readings. If too thick, the X-rays cannot penetrate deeply enough to give accurate or repeatable results. The good news there are other measurement techniques available able to measure thick nickel deposits.
Electrolytic and low phosphorus electroless nickel on aluminum and copper
Elemental nickel is paramagnetic. This means nickel is weakly attracted to magnetic fields; nickel will not ‘stick’ to steel, but a magnet will stick to nickel. Magnetic methods can measure nickel on non-magnetic bases, such as aluminum and copper. As the nickel thickness increases, so does the magnetic attraction. The increasing magnetic attraction is then correlated to a coating thickness. Magnetic methods may also apply to electroless nickel having a phosphorus content below ~7-8 wt%.
The paramagnetic properties of nickel, and low phosphorus electroless nickel, can change over time. To ensure accuracy it is best practice to create your own gage calibration standards from materials you have plated. This will ensure the paramagnetic properties of the calibration materials match those of what is being plated. Measurements of electrolytic and low phosphorus nickel coatings, up to ~ 6 mil (6,000 µ”, 150 µm), may be possible using magnetic methods.
Electrolytic nickel on magnetic steels
As mentioned above, electrolytic nickel is paramagnetic. Therefore, magnetic methods cannot measure nickel on magnetic steel (both the coating and the base are magnetic). Phase-sensitive eddy current is appropriate for these applications. Phase-sensitive eddy current (PSEC) measures eddy current phase angle shifts, created by changing nickel thicknesses, to correlate to a coating thickness. As with the magnetic method, the user must make their own calibration standards to ensure the eddy current properties of the calibration standard match those of the actual parts. Measurement of nickel coatings, up to ~ 4 mil (4,000 µ”, 100 µm), are possible using the Phase Sensitive Eddy Current test method. Unfortunately, PSEC is not appropriate for low phosphorus electroless nickel.
Other methods
Beta backscatter: The beta backscatter can be an effective, nondestructive test method to measure a thickness of nickel coatings, both electrolytic and electroless. Beta backscatter is limited to applications having at least five atomic numbers between the base material and the coating. Measurement of nickel thicknesses on aluminum is possible with beta backscatter. Beta backscatter is not appropriate for nickel on steel or aluminum because they are too close together on the periodic table. Measurement of nickel coatings up to 4 mil (4,000 µ”, 100 µm), may be possible using beta backscatter.
Coulometric: This technique uses an electrolyte solution and an electrical current to remove the nickel coating, a reverse of the plating process. The electric current applied is directly proportional to the mass removed, and the resulting deplating time is correlated to a coating thickness. Therefore, the coulometric method is considered destructive, leaving a small ~ 1-3 mm Ø (~ 0.04 “ – 0.12” Ø) circle where the plated layer has been removed.
Advantages of the coulometric method is that is can be used to measure multiple nickel layers, using what is know as the STEP test, and measure multiple, different layers, such as chrome-nickel-copper.
Measurement of nickel thickness up to ~ 2 mil (2,000 µ”, 50 µm) are possible using the coulometric method.
Summary: XRF is often the go-to for measuring nickel and electroless nickel coating. However, XRF does have upper thickness limitations, with nickel coatings becoming challenging to measure starting around 1.2 mil (1,200 µ”, 30 µm). Other methods do exist to help platers and coaters measure thick nickel coatings. I recommend speaking with your instrument vendor’s applications team to review your measurement tasks.
About the Author
Rob Weber
Rob Weber is the Director of Sales for Fischer Technology, Inc., located in Windsor, Connecticut. Visit helmut-fischer.com.
Related Content
SUR/FIN 2023: Capsules from the Technical Sessions I: Emerging Technologies
SUR/FIN 2023 in Cleveland this past June was a resounding success. Due to the efforts of the Technical Activities Committee, ably led by Bill Nebiolo this year, an outstanding program of technical presentations was offered. What follows are summaries of selected presentations from the Emerging Technologies sessions. Additional coverage will be provided in this space in the coming months. The full report can be accessed and printed at short.pfonline.com/NASF23Aug1.
Read MoreMastering Uniformity Through Surface Prep Standardization
By standardizing surface preparation processes and adopting surface energy measurement, a company can achieve uniformity, quality and cost reduction.
Read MoreShedding Light on Surface Inspection
State-of-the-art reflector-based lighting system improves luminosity and ergonomics for surface inspection tasks while reducing energy usage.
Read MoreNASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #121: Development of a Sustainability Metrics System and a Technical Solution Method for Sustainable Metal Finishing - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the twelfth quarter of project work (January-March 2023) at Wayne State University in Detroit. In this period, our main effort concentrated on documenting technical content that was yet to be reported, including analysis of costs for specific technologies for sustainability improvement.
Read MoreRead Next
A ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago
The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.
Read MoreDelivering Increased Benefits to Greenhouse Films
Baystar's Borstar technology is helping customers deliver better, more reliable production methods to greenhouse agriculture.
Read MoreEpisode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions
Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.
Read More