Dielectric Testing to Determine Tank Leaks
Goad CEO Curtis Goad suggests using dielectric testing, more commonly known as “spark testing,” to detect pinholes in containment systems.
Q. How do I detect leaks in my tanks or containment systems?
A. Given the focus on environmental regulations and safety, it is important to detect any leaks in containment tanks early—especially when they contain toxic materials, such as those used in surface finishing processes. Prompt detection allows for repair before there is extensive damage to the substrate or, worse, to the surrounding environment.
Dielectric testing, more commonly known as “spark testing” or “holiday testing,” is commonly used to detect pinholes in containment systems. A point source of voltage is applied across the lining; when it comes in contact with a void, it causes the current to ground with the conductive substrate and creates a spark.
For tank linings, high-voltage AC (plug-in) spark testing is commonly performed. The drawback to this method is that small handheld models may not be properly calibrated for use with thicker lining materials, and an unskilled operator can burn holes in the lining with the heat that is created from the resulting arc. AC spark testing also relies on the operator to visually identify a spark when a leak is detected.
DC (battery-powered) spark testers, which require a ground cable in contact with the substrate, can adjust the test voltage to the lining thickness. When a circuit is created, signaling a leak, the DC spark tester sounds an audible and visual alarm, and a spark may be seen. Upon creation of the circuit, newer DC models instantly drop the voltage, preventing potential damage to the lining. DC spark testers have been proven to find pinhole and capillary leaks in tank linings that AC spark testers miss.
Full-tank leak detection also is an option. By installing a rigid box liner over a steel-lined or plastic tank, and allowing for a space between the bottom of the liner and the bottom of the steel-lined or plastic tank, a periodic full-tank leak check can be performed utilizing a low-voltage electric current meter. This device measures the circuit, if any, between the solution contained in the inner tank liner and water that fills the space between the inner liner and outer lined tank.
If a leak in the liner is detected, it is contained in the outer tank. During scheduled downtime, the tank can be emptied, and the inner liner can be repaired or replaced.
Curtis Goad is CEO of Goad Co. Visit goadco.com.
Related Content
-
Hubbard-Hall Acquires BioConversion Technology
The acquisition adds experience and biologics to the AquaPure product line.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.