Saving Energy and Reducing Noxious Fumes

Q. I am exploring the possibility of using polypropylene balls as thermal insulation in some of our process tanks. Can you share some of your general insights on this practice? What are some concerns I should have? Finally, do you have any special advice in regards to implementing the practice? –M.O.

A. The use of covers for plating process tanks is a good idea. By covering process tanks you will save energy and reduce emissions. An excellent article regarding covers was published in Products Finishing in 2011. This article discusses the use of solid lids on plating process tanks. Numbers generated in this study showed impressive energy savings. If you don’t want to consider mechanical covers the use of "floating thermal insulation” – a fancy name for the use of polypropylene floating balls – will also give you savings in terms of energy and reduction of objectionable fumes and odors.

Polypropylene balls can reduce exposed surface area by as much as 90 percent. Polypropylene is resistant to most chemicals and can withstand temperatures of over 200°F. I recommend solid balls over hollow ones. The hollow balls tend to damage more easily and if punctured can fill with liquid and no longer float effectively. The balls are available in a number of different diameters. Some data that I dug out of my files suggest that use of 1 ½-inch diameter balls will give you as much as 75 percent energy savings at a temperature of approximately 190°F.

The only downside that I am aware of using floating balls is that they can get lodged in crevices of the parts placed in the tank. Larger diameter balls are less likely to get lodged in the parts.

A clever variation of the balls is a hexagonal shaped float called "Hexies" that are available in a couple of different sizes. They are reported to give a heat loss reduction of as much as to 80 percent.

My overall advice is to go for it.

Related Content

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023

This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 6th Quarterly Report

The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation. This sixth quarter report covers the continued assessment of eight perfluoroalkyl acids PFAAs most commonly found in wastewaters, by electro-oxidation with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode across a range of anodic potentials in solutions, exploring the reaction mechanisms. To summarize, the PFAAs start to exhibit degradation behavior when the anodic potential reaches a level where water oxidation occurs, suggesting that the hydroxyl free radicals generated via water oxidation play a role in PFAA degradation.
EPA Readying Fall Nationwide PFAS Survey of Metal Finishing Industry to Inform New Water Discharge Rule

NASF continues discussions with US EPA on the agency’s plans for a nationwide survey of the metal finishing industry on its use of PFAS. NASF plans to review the draft survey and provide feedback to the agency prior to its distribution. Surveys will likely go to a wide range of job shop and captive operations and are scheduled to be sent out in the fall.