Chrome Reduction
What is the best way to reduce hexavalent chrome to trivalent chrome from an aluminum conversion coating rinse water?
Q. What is the best way to reduce hexavalent chrome to trivalent chrome from an aluminum conversion coating rinse water? K.O.
A. The “best way” depends upon many factors such as safety concerns, volume of wastewater, discharge limits and final discharge. That being said, our experience has been that, for the vast majority of chrome reduction applications, the use of sodium metabisulfite (MBS) is best.
Sodium metabisulfite (Na2S2O5), when added to water, forms sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3), which reacts with the hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) to form trivalent chromium (Cr+3) according to the following reaction:
3NaHSO3 + 2H2CrO4 >>> Cr2(SO4)3 + 3NaHSO4 + 5H2O.
Approximately 2.8 lbs of MBS and 1.5 lbs of sulfuric acid are needed to reduce 1 lb of hexavalent chrome. Because the speed of the reaction is pH-dependent (speed decreases as pH increases), we typically design for a retention time of 15–20 min and a pH of 2–2.5.
To feed the MBS solution into the rapidly mixed chrome reduction tank, an oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) sensor and controller is used. A set point of -300 millivolts is adequate for most applications. As you become more familiar with the system, you may want to increase (become more negative) the set point in 25-milli-volt increments and check the validity of the setting. There are several suppliers of colorimetric testing kits for hexavalent chrome (sample turns purple if hexavalent chrome is present) that can be used to determine the best ORP set point; -400 millivolts is the maximum set point that most have found to be acceptable, but each wastestream needs to be evaluated.
Alternative technologies for chrome reduction include sulfur dioxide gas, sodium hydrosulfite, ferrous sulfate, scrap iron/steel/steel wool and electrochemical.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – 7th & 8th Quarter Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the seventh and eighth quarters of project work (October 2021-March 2022) at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The major activities reported are: (1) to investigate 6:2 FTS oxidation, a common replacement compound for PFOS in the electroplating industry, and (2) PFAS oxidation in both a wastewater sample procured from an electroplating facility and in synthetic solutions.
-
Zinc Phosphate: Questions and Answers
Our experts share specific questions about zinc phosphate and pretreatment
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 7th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation. Our last report described the results from experiments of EO with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode on the degradation of eight perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs). In this seven quarter report, we describe work to further explore how the degradation of different PFAAs are related to their molecular structures.