Chrome Reduction
What is the best way to reduce hexavalent chrome to trivalent chrome from an aluminum conversion coating rinse water?
Q. What is the best way to reduce hexavalent chrome to trivalent chrome from an aluminum conversion coating rinse water? K.O.
A. The “best way” depends upon many factors such as safety concerns, volume of wastewater, discharge limits and final discharge. That being said, our experience has been that, for the vast majority of chrome reduction applications, the use of sodium metabisulfite (MBS) is best.
Sodium metabisulfite (Na2S2O5), when added to water, forms sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3), which reacts with the hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) to form trivalent chromium (Cr+3) according to the following reaction:
3NaHSO3 + 2H2CrO4 >>> Cr2(SO4)3 + 3NaHSO4 + 5H2O.
Approximately 2.8 lbs of MBS and 1.5 lbs of sulfuric acid are needed to reduce 1 lb of hexavalent chrome. Because the speed of the reaction is pH-dependent (speed decreases as pH increases), we typically design for a retention time of 15–20 min and a pH of 2–2.5.
To feed the MBS solution into the rapidly mixed chrome reduction tank, an oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) sensor and controller is used. A set point of -300 millivolts is adequate for most applications. As you become more familiar with the system, you may want to increase (become more negative) the set point in 25-milli-volt increments and check the validity of the setting. There are several suppliers of colorimetric testing kits for hexavalent chrome (sample turns purple if hexavalent chrome is present) that can be used to determine the best ORP set point; -400 millivolts is the maximum set point that most have found to be acceptable, but each wastestream needs to be evaluated.
Alternative technologies for chrome reduction include sulfur dioxide gas, sodium hydrosulfite, ferrous sulfate, scrap iron/steel/steel wool and electrochemical.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #121: Development of a Sustainability Metrics System and a Technical Solution Method for Sustainable Metal Finishing - 15th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the twelfth quarter of project work (October-December 2023) at Wayne State University in Detroit. In this period, our main effort focused on the development of a set of Digital Twins (DTs) using the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) technology with application on parts rinsing simulation.
-
Hubbard-Hall Acquires BioConversion Technology
The acquisition adds experience and biologics to the AquaPure product line.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
