Cure Oven Installation Options
What would be the total energy savings of an elevated oven per hour with bottom entry when compared to the floor-mounted oven?
Q. We’re currently planning a layout for a powder coating line, and I have a question regarding the cure oven setup. I’m trying to evaluate the pros and cons for an elevated oven with a bottom entry and bottom exit when compared with a floor-mounted oven with a horizontal oven entrance and exit. We would use air-knives at the exit end to keep hot air in, but not at the entry because we know it will blow uncured powder off the parts.
What would be the total energy savings of an elevated oven per hour with bottom entry when compared to the floor-mounted oven? Any help would be appreciated. J.P.
A. A typical horizontal oven entry will lose around 50,000 Btu/hr/sq ft with no parts moving through the entry. When parts pass across the opening, the losses are double, worse than if there were no air curtain at all. If you decide to go with a floor-mounted oven, you should make the vestibule as long as possible, a minimum of eight feet at both ends.
Air knives are not too effective from a cost perspective, because they use a lot of electricity. It takes a lot of velocity to influence the migration of heat out of the oven and diminish the inflow of cooler air. The larger the opening (greater than 3” across) will be much less effective and require a lot more air. The net impact when compared with a longer vestibule is a more expensive operation with the air curtain than without.
A bottom entry oven loses around 3,000 to 5,000 Btu/hr per square feet. Heated air expands in the oven and a small amount is pushed out of the bottom opening but not nearly as much as the horizontal opening. The entrance is usually larger to allow for the incline of parts. The losses are usually about 75% lower than a horizontal oven.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 10th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams. This report covers the 10th quarter of work (April-June 2023). Here, we examine the effect of surface fluorination of Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation performance in terms of energy performance as well as formation of chlorate and perchlorate when chloride is present in the solution. The full paper on this work can be accessed and printed at short.pfonline.com/NASF24Feb2.
-
One-Spray EV Battery Coating Provides Water Resistance and Chemicals
AkzoNobel's Resicoat launches one-spray powder coatings technology for EV battery systems, enhancing safety and productivity with high dielectric strength.
-
Clean Chemistry for Fuel Cell Technology
Leading efforts to improve hydrogen fuel cell efficiency, this Indiana company has developed chemistry that cleans the inorganic contaminants from inside a vehicle’s radiator. This results in cleaner coolant and a more efficiently run hydrogen fuel cell.