E-Coat Q&A: Gap Size Specifications
E-Coat expert Jose Tirado answers a question on whether there is a standard or a design rule that specifies the minimum gap necessary for complete coating during electrocoating?
Q. I cannot find a standard or a design rule that specifies the minimum gap necessary for complete coating during electrocoating. We design complex, geometrical metal fabrications, and many times we have to leave small gaps between components of the assemblies. R.D.
A. There is no formal standard or design rule that I know of for determining minimum gap sizes. Whether or not your electrocoat would properly deposit in gaps will depend on your specific electrocoat technology, application and operating conditions of voltage; percent solids; temperature; agitation; and dwell time. Whether or not your machine is a square transfer or continuous monorail could also have an impact on the outcome of coating inside minimum gaps.
The ability of electrocoat paint to deposit in tight spaces is called throwpower. Most electrocoats will build inside gaps of 8-10 mm to a depth of 1-3 inches, with a decreasing film thickness pattern from the outside to the inside. As the gap size increases, the thickness profile will equalize between the outside and inside. For gaps around 25 mm, typical electrocoats could deposit more than 400 mm.
Testing several gap sizes in probe assemblies would indicate the minimum distance or gap for your specific geometry and conditions in regards to not only film deposition, but also for adequate cleaning and phosphating. In my experience, open gaps of 7-8 mm or smaller are acceptable if they are open in both ends, but could be too small for liquids to freely enter and exit if the gap is closed on one end. In many cases with small gaps of less than 1 mm, liquids enter via capillary action and get trapped deep inside. These conditions create unacceptable quality defects due to kick-outs and boil-outs.
For more answers from Jose Tirado, please click here
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters - April 2022-March 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers project work from April 2022 to March 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The overall objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Initial results for the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts are discussed.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 10th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams. This report covers the 10th quarter of work (April-June 2023). Here, we examine the effect of surface fluorination of Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation performance in terms of energy performance as well as formation of chlorate and perchlorate when chloride is present in the solution. The full paper on this work can be accessed and printed at short.pfonline.com/NASF24Feb2.
-
Defoamer Designed for Waterborne Coating, Printing Ink Formulations
Evonik’s Tego Foamex 812 exemplifies the company’s sustainability strategy for the paintings, coatings and inks industry.