Electrolytic or Electroless?
We are plating a part that is approximately ¼ inch × 1 inch. The required deposit is approximately 0.0003 inches thick. Should we consider electroless or electrolytic nickel?
Q. We are plating a part that is approximately ¼ inch × 1 inch. The required deposit is approximately 0.0003 inches thick. Should we consider electroless or electrolytic nickel? P.J.
A. The part you describe is ideal for barrel nickel electroplating. You use the word approximately in describing the thickness of the plate. Reading between the lines (and I know that one should not assume anything), I gather that the deposit does not have to be perfectly distributed over the surface of the part. If for some reason you need extremely tight tolerances, you might consider electroless nickel.
Keep in mind that electroless nickel is always a more expensive coating then electrolytic nickel, and that the physical properties of electrolytic and electroless nickel are not the same.
Related Content
-
How to Choose Between Sulfate and Chloride-Based Trivalent Chromium
There are several factors to consider when choosing between sulfate and chloride-based baths for trivalent chromium plating. Mark Schario of Columbia Chemical discusses the differences and what platers should keep in mind when evaluating options.
-
Products Finishing Reveals 2023 Qualifying Top Shops
Each year PF conducts its Top Shops Benchmarking Survey, offering shops a tool to better understand their overall performance in the industry. The program also recognizes shops that meet a set of criteria to qualify as Top Shops.
-
The Importance of Strike Solutions
Electroplating strikes are used to improve adhesion and create a foundation for subsequent layers when plating. In this helpful article, Adam Blakeley of MacDermid Enthone offers an insightful guide to understanding electroplating strikes.
