Film Build Control
Are you aware of any standards on powder coating film thickness on complex structures?
Q. Are you aware of any standards on powder coating film thickness on complex structures? We have a customer that requires 80-100 microns on a complex chassis for a mini tractor, but, due to the construction, there will be 60-300 microns in corners and other complex areas. I am looking for a standard or some studies or guidelines that can be used for “industrial” production.
A. I searched for a written industry standard but I cannot find one in the “PCI Handbook” or other sources. Generally, on flat or simple surfaces, the film build can be held to ±0.5 mil (±12.5 microns) of powder. So, for example, if the specification is an average of 2 mils (50 microns), then the film variation would be from 1.5 to 2.5 mils (37.5 to 62.5 microns). If the part has a more complex shape, the film variation will be greater. A medium-complexity shape could cause a variation of ±1 mils (±25 microns), and a very complex part may cause a difference of as much as 2.5 mils in either direction. As a result, on a complex part, the film build could easily run from a low of 2.0 mils to a high of 7.0 mils (50 to 175 microns). The film build can be controlled to the best possible level by using accurate and consistent process controls and gun settings. Practice with scrap parts or models to perfect your settings and technique.
Variation in Cured Thickness
Q. We have an application that specifies both a minimum and maximum film thickness and we are having difficulty keeping within the limits. This is a smooth epoxy powder being applied to electroless nickel plated copper. We are applying the powder with a manual electrostatic spray system. The limits are 3.5 to 7 mils thickness. We try to remain as consistent as possible with the number, speed and distance of passes, but still get a tremendous amount of variation in final cured thickness. Any suggestions on how to better control this process so we can meet the customer requirements? We have asked some of our powder suppliers about controlling to a min/max thickness specification and were told they had never heard of such a request.
A. Many products are judged by full coverage and do not have a film build tolerance. However, there are specifications from some manufacturers for minimum and maximum film thickness. The minimum thickness is related to appearance (complete coverage) and performance. The maximum thickness could be related to fit or in some cases appearance. Heavy films build up more ions in the film and are more likely to show excessive orange peel.
Control of film-build with a manual gun is somewhat challenging. Your approach to consistent application is the right direction and should be reasonably effective. If your pattern is smooth and consistent and your technique is smooth and consistent you should be able to meet the specification of 3.5 to 7.0 mils. Gun-to-target distance is particularly important. Consistent hanging patterns are also important. There are a couple of other factors that could be affecting your film build control.
First of all, you must have good earth ground. Poor ground will have a big impact on film build control. You need clean hooks and clean path to earth ground. You need to measure earth ground with a good ohm meter and show resistance below 1 mega-ohm.
The geometry of the part is also critical. If the surface is irregular you will have more difficulty getting consistent thickness. One thing that will help with control over irregular shapes is limiting the current draw. A current draw above 20 micro-amps may have more influence on the film thickness due to areas of resistance on the part surface (Faraday Cage effect). You can experiment to find the optimum level of current and you should be able to improve the film build consistency. A typical effective current level for a manual gun over an irregular surface is between 10 and 40 micro amps. A level of current that is below 20 micro-amps is usually best.
Consistent gun settings, consistent hanging, consistent technique, good ground and current limiting should help you get better film build control. Be sure the powder pattern is uniform and the velocity of the powder is low. Make sure the parts are spaced correctly. If the parts are too close you may have trouble building up powder along the edges. If the parts are too far apart the edge of the part may have strong voltage lines and create some picture framing.
One thing you can be certain of is that anyone who says they have never heard of a min/max film build requirement is not very well informed.
Related Content
Powder Coating 4.0: Smarter, Faster, More Efficient and Connected
New tools reduce cost and waste, lower manufacturing footprint of powder coating operations.
Read MoreLow-Temperature-Cure Powder Coatings Offer Unique Opportunities
An in-depth look at the advantages of low-temperature-cure powder coatings and the considerations for incorporating them into your process.
Read MoreConveyors and Paint Systems
Choosing the right conveyor system, coating technology, and ancillary equipment.
Read More12 Ways to Improve Your Powder Coating Quality
Often overlooked powder coating procedures that can help you elevate your quality, streamline your operations and improve your profitability.
Read MoreRead Next
Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining
Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.
Read MoreA ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago
The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.
Read MoreEpisode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions
Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.
Read More