Greener Paints
Although we don’t use much paint, we would like to do our part for the environment by using greener paints such as water-based in our plant.
Q. My brother and I own a small manufacturing company here in the Midwest. We manufacture a line of farm implements and farm machine attachments. These products are cleaned by hand and painted by brush because we don’t produce enough parts to support a paint line. Although we don’t use much paint, we would like to do our part for the environment by using greener paints such as water-based in our plant. We quit using lead based paints when we heard that the regulators wanted them off the market. Now we want to take the next step and join the crowd going greener. What paints do you recommend? G.L.
A. Join the crowd, G.L. It has been decades since the paint industry embarked on their “Get the Lead Out” campaign for trade sales paint and industrial users were prohibited from using lead containing paints in their plants. Since then there are other corrosion-inhibiting pigments available as replacements for lead in industrial paint formulations.
Since you are applying paints by brushing, you are already greener than other manufacturers using spray guns. You don’t have to worry about increasing your transfer efficiency (TE) because application by brushing is nearly 100%.
Greener (environmentally safe) paints available today come in the form of waterborne, high solids, and some two-component materials. Use of these coatings will reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Owing to their limited pot life, using the two-component paints may cause problems since you apply your paints by brushing. I don’t make specific paint company product recommendations in Painting Clinic. Therefore, I suggest you ask your paint supplier for specific product recommendations.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
-
Ultrafiltration Membranes, Filter Elements for Improved Industrial Water Reuse
Ultrafiltration membranes help with water reuse in a variety of applications.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.
