Proper Sieve Size for Powder Coating's Smooth Results
Kevin Biller at ChemQuest Powder Coating Research gives recommendations for sieve size to ensure surface smoothness.
Q: Which size sieve is normal for production of high glossy and smooth powder coating?
A: High glossy and smooth powder coatings require a narrow particle size distribution. The top end “scalp” is critical to ensure the desired smoothness. Good milling conditions are also important to make sure there is minimal waste, so it is wise to manage the grinding process first. The rotor speed and classifier wheel settings need to be optimized to minimize both the fines (<10 microns) and coarse fractions (>100 microns).
As for sieve size, I would start with a 125-micron screen, then check particle size distribution and, most importantly, film smoothness. If this does not produce the desired smoothness, then move to a 100-micron screen. This should yield the desired smoothness; however, you may have a large quantity of “overs” (>100 microns). This fraction can be reintroduced to the mill to manage the yield. If the 100-micron screen doesn’t produce the desired smoothness, then you must work on reducing the viscosity of the resin system. In addition, you may also have to slow down the cure rate of the resin/crosslinker.
About the Author
Kevin Biller
Kevin Biller is the director of ChemQuest Powder Coating Research. Visit chemquest.com.
Related Content
-
How to Address Declining Powder Coating Coverage Over Time
Fine particles from reclaim could be to blame for powder coating problems that emerge over time. Avoid problems by keeping hooks clean, maintaining guns and using reclaim powder quickly to avoid accumulation of fines.
-
Prevent Plating Problems with Critical Inspections
Tanks and their contents should be regularly inspected visually and analytically. When a quality issue arises, it is important to quickly pinpoint where the main problem is by checking which parameter is out of line.
-
Trivalent Chrome Overview
As the finishing industry begins to move away from the use of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, what factors should finishers consider as they make new investments? Mark Schario, chief technology officer for Columbia Chemical offers a helpful overview of this complicated topic.
