custom masking products
Published

Where could iron be coming from in our epoxy electrocoat, and what options do we have to fix the problem?

Where could iron be coming from in our epoxy electrocoat, and what options do we have to fix the problem?

Share

Q. We have been having some difficulties with the roughness and appearance of our epoxy electrocoat, and our supplier has told us that we have high iron content in the e-coat bath. As a result, they are asking us to find out where the iron is coming from, replace the bath and then make a new one, which is difficult and expensive for us to do. Do you know where the iron could be coming from, and are there alternative methods to dumping the tank? –S.U.

A. In cathodic electrocoat paint systems, the iron would be deposited onto the grounded parts just like charged electrocoat resins and pigments because iron presents a positive charge in aqueous solutions. High iron levels typically produce ecoat films that are rough or tight and have marginal appearance, as in your case. Additionally, iron-contaminated electrocoat systems provide poor corrosion performance because the iron promotes blister formation and speeds up scribe creep during salt spray exposures. In cathodic acrylic systems, the presence of iron can also affect film performance to UV exposure, producing films with excessive gloss loss, color drift or fading.

Sources of the iron can be multiple. Sometimes the high iron levels come from excessive dissolution of the anodes into the anolyte solution. Tears and holes in the anodes or excessive anolyte sweating cause the iron to migrate from the anolyte solution into the paint bath. High anolyte conductivities, low anolyte pH or low-grade SS anode materials can greatly contribute to this excessive anode dissolution.

In other situations, sources of the iron in the ecoat bath can be fallen parts in the tank, steel blast dust or shot brought in with the raw parts. Also, all piping, tank and accessories in contact with the electrocoat paint must be of acid resistance materials like SS or PVC as they can contribute iron into the e-coat bath.

As your electrocoat supplier indicates, the sources of the iron must be identified and corrected before you can proceed with implementing the next steps. If the sources are not eliminated from the process, the new electrocoat bath will just become contaminated again.

For an epoxy system, once the source has been identified and corrected, you should evaluate your bath to analyze the rate of iron decline and the improvement in appearance or performance under your specific coating rates. If the current rate is acceptable, the situation will continue to improve gradually. If, on the other hand, the rate of improvement is not acceptable to you, then the electrocoat bath must be replaced. There are no other effective or proven methods of eliminating iron from the bath than coating it out or replacing it.

Reusing the old electrocoat bath should also be evaluated if cost is an issue and if the initial iron levels are less than two to three times the permissible iron levels. Small feed rates of the old material under controlled conditions could be incorporated with raw resin and paste feeds. With patience and time, the old material could be reused.

If the iron level in your old bath is too high, then the bath must be discarded according to local governing regulations.

Your Best Finish Starts With Us!
Filtration
Gardner Intelligence
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
Parts Cleaning Conference
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
Fischer Technology, Inc.
New Acid-Free Bright Nickel Process
More blasting. Less part handling.
FABTECH 2024
Koch Finishing Systems
Metal Pretreatment Technology

Related Content

Parts Cleaning

Ultrafiltration Membranes, Filter Elements for Improved Industrial Water Reuse

Ultrafiltration membranes help with water reuse in a variety of applications.

Read More
nasf

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 7th Quarterly Report

The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation.  Our last report described the results from experiments of EO with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode on the degradation of eight perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs).  In this seven quarter report, we describe work to further explore how the degradation of different PFAAs are related to their molecular structures.

Read More

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters - April 2022-March 2023

This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers project work from April 2022 to March 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago.  The overall objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater.  Initial results for the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts are discussed.    

Read More
sustainability

Hubbard-Hall Acquires BioConversion Technology

The acquisition adds experience and biologics to the AquaPure product line.

Read More

Read Next

Powder Coating

Powder Coating 4.0: Smarter, Faster, More Efficient and Connected

New tools reduce cost and waste, lower manufacturing footprint of powder coating operations.

Read More
automotive

The 2024 Ford Mustang: All the Colors Available

Although Chevrolet has announced the end of the Camaro and Dodge is offering “Last Call” editions of the Charger and Challenger, the Ford Mustang is launching to its seventh generation.

Read More
Electroplating

Episode 42: An Interview with Robin Deal, Hubbard-Hall

Hubbard-Hall wastewater treatment specialist Robin Deal discusses the latest trends in wastewater management. 

Read More
More blasting. Less part handling.