Non-cyanide alkaline silver plating, mobile app
Published

EPA Submits for White House Review its Proposed Rule to List PFOS and PFOA as Hazardous Substance under CERCLA

EPA submitted proposed a rule to list PFOS and PFOA as Superfund hazardous substances to the White House for review.  The rule could subject PFOS and PFOA to release reporting and cleanup cost recovery requirements.

Jeff Hannapel; NASF/The Policy Group

Share

On January 10, 2022, EPA formally submitted to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) its first-time plan to designate perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as “hazardous substances” under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Act (CERCLA or the Superfund law).  Such a designation would set new precedent as EPA has never before designated a new chemical as a CERCLA hazardous substance.

OMB reviews are generally intended to last 90 days, so EPA appears to be on track to issue the proposal in March 2022.  The agency expects to issue a final rule in the summer of 2023.

Once finalized, the regulation would trigger a host of actions, from release reporting to cost recovery and contribution claims.  The reporting will enable federal, state, and local authorities to collect information regarding the location and extent of releases of PFOS and PFOA.  In addition, EPA, other agencies or private parties may be able to seek cost recovery or contributions for costs incurred for the cleanup of releases of PFOS and PFOA.

NASF will continue to monitor this rule development and provide updates to NASF members.  If you have any questions or would like additional information on this issue, please contact Jeff Hannapel at jhannapel@thepolicygroup.com.


This update is courtesy of the National Association for Surface Finishing (NASF). For more information or to become a member, visit nasf.org.

Related Content

  • Hexavalent to trivalent chromium — the environmental benefits

    Regulatory pressures to switch from hexavalent chromium to trivalent alternatives are a growing concern for many finishing operations. In this Products Finishing Ask the Expert clinic, Brittany McKinney of Pavco discusses the environmental considerations driving these regulations. 

  • Bryan Leiker, MFACA, Discusses CARB Public Hearing Over Calif. Hex Chrome Ban

    Bryan Leiker, executive director, Metal Finishing Association of California, offers a recap of a January 27, 2023, public hearing conducted by the California Air Resources Board prior to an impending ruling on a proposed ban of hexavalent chromium use for finishing operations in the state.

  • Trivalent Chrome Overview

    As the finishing industry begins to move away from the use of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, what factors should finishers consider as they make new investments? Mark Schario, chief technology officer for Columbia Chemical offers a helpful overview of this complicated topic.

manufacturer of E-coat systems
The Finishing Industry’s Education and Networking Resource
Gardner Intelligence
find masking products online
Products Finishing Top Shops Benchmarking Survey
Filtration Systems
PF Podcast
Metal Pretreatment Technology
Products Finishing Top Shops Benchmarking Survey