Alkaline Zinc Electroplating
Question: The May 2003 letter from J.K. sounds familiar.
Question:
The May 2003 letter from J.K. sounds familiar. I expect that his problem may be, as you pointed out, related to a chelator in the system. While it did not seem to affect removal of zinc from our plating wastewater, we saw copper in our effluent skyrocket when the final electrocleaning stage started using an additive with an amine compound. We have a similar process and treatment system. We do alkaline zinc electroplating and four colors of zinc chromate conversion coating. Our wastewater treatment process has two pH adjustment stages. In the first, we control pH to around 5 and add a blend of calcium chloride with a cationic polymer. In the second stage, we increase the pH to 8.5 - 9, followed by adding an anionic flocculant, settling and a Dyna-Sand filter. Since we got the chemistry and sand filter operating parameters dialed in last summer, our effluent zinc levels have been around 0.05 mg/l. The calcium chloride/polymer blend is admittedly more expensive than the ferric chloride we used to use, but the reduction in sludge volume of nearly 40% gave us overall cost savings of $2,100 in the first year. - D.L.
Answer:
Thanks, D.L., for sharing your similar experience with the readers of Pollution Control Clinic. Glad to see that the calcium chloride/cationic polymer blend worked for you. I followed up with J.K. on his efforts, and he reported that a calcium chloride/cationic polymer blend at an acidic pH followed by pH adjustment, settling and sand filter was unable to reduce their zinc to consistently below one mg/liter; looks like he will need a “metal scavenger” chemistry.
Just goes to show you that, just like metal finishing chemistry, the chemistry of treatment for metal finishing wastewaters is a mixture of science and art; what works at one facility does not necessarily mean it will work at another.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
-
Zinc Phosphate: Questions and Answers
Our experts share specific questions about zinc phosphate and pretreatment
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.