PMTS 2025 Register Now!
Published

Anodizing Emission Rates

Question: I am trying to find information about anodizing emission rates.

Share

Question:

I am trying to find information about anodizing emission rates. Our local air pollution control agency does not have any information on sulfuric acid anodizing tank emissions, but they do have information on chromic acid anodizing rates. They are looking for this figure in lb/hr. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Answer:

After some research, I believe that I have found an approach that would be acceptable to your local air pollution agency regarding estimated emissions from a sulfuric acid anodizing tank without doing expensive stack sampling. One of my references is EPA's AP-42 emission factors, where your local agency would obtain the chromic acid anodizing emission rate. AP-42 does not contain an emission factor for sulfuric acid anodizing. Based upon AP-42's Table 12-20-2 - Emission Factors for Chromic Acid Anodizing, the total chrome emission rate is 2.0 grains/hr/ft2 or 0.00029 lb/hr/ft2 while the total particulate emission rate is 4.2 grains/hr/ft2 or 0.00061 lb/hr/ft2. In reviewing the background document for AP-42, it stated that using surface area of the anodizing tank was the "best" parameter to correlate with the emission rate, and the average chromic acid concentration of the tanks tested was about 9 oz/gal.

The other reference I found was a presentation at the 2000 AESF/EPA Conference for Environmental Excellence, "Characterizing Site Specific Source Emissions for EPA's Risk Assessment Tool for the Metal Finishing Industry" by S. Schwartz and M. Lorber. This paper reported the work of EPA and the National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) in the development of a means of determining risk assessment for workers in and local residents of finishing facilities. Based upon an extrapolation that this paper suggested, the following equation can be used to estimate the emissions from sulfuric acid anodizing tanks:

 

  • EMa = ( (CCa × CDa)/CEa )/( (CCcr × CDcr)/CEcr) ) × ERcr x Aa
  • where EMa = emission rate of anodizing tank (lb/hr)
  • CCa = pollutant concentration in the anodizing tank (oz/gal)
  • CDa = current density of the anodizing process (amp/in2)
  • CEa = cathode efficiency of anodizing process, assumed at 95% based upon above presentation
  • CCcr = chromic acid concentration, assumed at 9 oz/gal based upon AP-42 background document,
  • CDcr = current density of chromic acid anodizing process, assumed at 3 amp/in2 based upon above presentation,
  • CEcr = cathode efficiency of chromic acid anodizing process, assumed at 95% based upon above presentation,
  • ERcr = pollutant emission rate from chromic acid anodizing process, and
  • Aa = surface area of anodizing tank, ft2

     

    For example, if the sulfuric acid concentration in the anodizing tank is 20 oz/gal, its current density at 0.1 amp/ft2, and the tank's surface area at 100 ft2, the estimated emission rate for sulfuric acid would be 0.002 lb/hr.

    From this estimate, the sulfuric emission rate is extremely small. Because the air emissions from the anodizing tank is in the form of a mist, the local air agency may also want to know the estimated particulate matter emission rate. To estimate this you would substitute the total solids concentration (oz/gal) for CCa.

    Last, even if you are not required to install a scrubber to control this low emission of sulfuric acid, I still recommend the use of a mesh pad de-mister with periodic washdown in order to protect your facility's roof and nearby property and vehicles from possible sulfuric acid mist fallout.

  • Luster-On Products
    Filtration Systems
    Metal Pretreatment Technology
    Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
    New Acid-Free Bright Nickel Process
    Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
    PF Podcast
    The Finishing Industry’s Education and Networking Resource

    Related Content

    Electroplating

    Pulling Out All the Stops

    Evolving coatings and finishes for automotive brake components. 

    Read More
    Anodizing

    Bryan Leiker, MFACA, Discusses CARB Public Hearing Over Calif. Hex Chrome Ban

    Bryan Leiker, executive director, Metal Finishing Association of California, offers a recap of a January 27, 2023, public hearing conducted by the California Air Resources Board prior to an impending ruling on a proposed ban of hexavalent chromium use for finishing operations in the state.

    Read More
    Anodizing

    Understanding and Managing White Spots on Anodized Aluminum

    Having trouble with spotting defects when anodizing? Taj Patel of Techevon LLC offers a helpful overview of the various causes of white spots and potential solutions.

    Read More
    Powder Coating

    Top Shop Aces Outstanding Customer Service

    More than a finishing shop, this anodizing, powder coating and vacuum resin impregnating business goes above and beyond for its customers by being a resource for whatever their finishing needs might demand.  

    Read More

    Read Next

    workforce development

    Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining

    Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.

    Read More
    Sponsored

    Delivering Increased Benefits to Greenhouse Films

    Baystar's Borstar technology is helping customers deliver better, more reliable production methods to greenhouse agriculture.

    Read More
    Parts Cleaning

    A ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago

    The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.   

    Read More
    PMTS 2025 Register Now!