More blasting. Less part handling.
Published

Anodizing Emission Rates

Question: I am trying to find information about anodizing emission rates.

Share

Question:

I am trying to find information about anodizing emission rates. Our local air pollution control agency does not have any information on sulfuric acid anodizing tank emissions, but they do have information on chromic acid anodizing rates. They are looking for this figure in lb/hr. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Answer:

After some research, I believe that I have found an approach that would be acceptable to your local air pollution agency regarding estimated emissions from a sulfuric acid anodizing tank without doing expensive stack sampling. One of my references is EPA's AP-42 emission factors, where your local agency would obtain the chromic acid anodizing emission rate. AP-42 does not contain an emission factor for sulfuric acid anodizing. Based upon AP-42's Table 12-20-2 - Emission Factors for Chromic Acid Anodizing, the total chrome emission rate is 2.0 grains/hr/ft2 or 0.00029 lb/hr/ft2 while the total particulate emission rate is 4.2 grains/hr/ft2 or 0.00061 lb/hr/ft2. In reviewing the background document for AP-42, it stated that using surface area of the anodizing tank was the "best" parameter to correlate with the emission rate, and the average chromic acid concentration of the tanks tested was about 9 oz/gal.

The other reference I found was a presentation at the 2000 AESF/EPA Conference for Environmental Excellence, "Characterizing Site Specific Source Emissions for EPA's Risk Assessment Tool for the Metal Finishing Industry" by S. Schwartz and M. Lorber. This paper reported the work of EPA and the National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) in the development of a means of determining risk assessment for workers in and local residents of finishing facilities. Based upon an extrapolation that this paper suggested, the following equation can be used to estimate the emissions from sulfuric acid anodizing tanks:

 

  • EMa = ( (CCa × CDa)/CEa )/( (CCcr × CDcr)/CEcr) ) × ERcr x Aa
  • where EMa = emission rate of anodizing tank (lb/hr)
  • CCa = pollutant concentration in the anodizing tank (oz/gal)
  • CDa = current density of the anodizing process (amp/in2)
  • CEa = cathode efficiency of anodizing process, assumed at 95% based upon above presentation
  • CCcr = chromic acid concentration, assumed at 9 oz/gal based upon AP-42 background document,
  • CDcr = current density of chromic acid anodizing process, assumed at 3 amp/in2 based upon above presentation,
  • CEcr = cathode efficiency of chromic acid anodizing process, assumed at 95% based upon above presentation,
  • ERcr = pollutant emission rate from chromic acid anodizing process, and
  • Aa = surface area of anodizing tank, ft2

     

    For example, if the sulfuric acid concentration in the anodizing tank is 20 oz/gal, its current density at 0.1 amp/ft2, and the tank's surface area at 100 ft2, the estimated emission rate for sulfuric acid would be 0.002 lb/hr.

    From this estimate, the sulfuric emission rate is extremely small. Because the air emissions from the anodizing tank is in the form of a mist, the local air agency may also want to know the estimated particulate matter emission rate. To estimate this you would substitute the total solids concentration (oz/gal) for CCa.

    Last, even if you are not required to install a scrubber to control this low emission of sulfuric acid, I still recommend the use of a mesh pad de-mister with periodic washdown in order to protect your facility's roof and nearby property and vehicles from possible sulfuric acid mist fallout.

  • Luster-On Products
    Anodizing Conference & Expo 2024
    FABTECH 2024
    Parts Cleaning Conference
    The Finishing Industry’s Education and Networking Resource
    More blasting. Less part handling.
    New Acid-Free Bright Nickel Process
    Fischer Technology, Inc.
    PF Podcast
    Metal Pretreatment Technology
    Koch Finishing Systems
    Gardner Intelligence

    Related Content

    Parts Cleaning

    Ultrafiltration Membranes, Filter Elements for Improved Industrial Water Reuse

    Ultrafiltration membranes help with water reuse in a variety of applications.

    Read More
    regulation

    In-House Blackening of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals

    Process satisfies customers’ shipping requirements while meeting stricter water regulations in times of drought.

    Read More
    basics

    Zinc Phosphate: Questions and Answers

    Our experts share specific questions about zinc phosphate and pretreatment

    Read More

    Novel Wastewater Treatment Targets Micropollutants

    Swiss wastewater treatment technology provider Oxyle specializes in advanced wastewater treatment for removal of highly persistent micropollutants such as PFAS.

    Read More

    Read Next

    sustainability

    Episode 42: An Interview with Robin Deal, Hubbard-Hall

    Hubbard-Hall wastewater treatment specialist Robin Deal discusses the latest trends in wastewater management. 

    Read More
    automotive

    The 2024 Ford Mustang: All the Colors Available

    Although Chevrolet has announced the end of the Camaro and Dodge is offering “Last Call” editions of the Charger and Challenger, the Ford Mustang is launching to its seventh generation.

    Read More
    Powder Coating

    Powder Coating 4.0: Smarter, Faster, More Efficient and Connected

    New tools reduce cost and waste, lower manufacturing footprint of powder coating operations.

    Read More
    cfs masking