Electrogrind Waste
Question: Our company currently electrogrinds the cut ends of small stainless tubes to deburr for further processing.
Question:
Our company currently electrogrinds the cut ends of small stainless tubes to deburr for further processing. The solution used is a nitrate salt with emulsifier to suspend the swarf. The 50 gal of solution is dumped to wastewater treatment when it contains about 3 g/liter iron and 0.5 g/liter nickel. How feasible would it be to remove the nickel and other metals via an electrowinning process? My goal is to reduce nickel and chrome by 90% prior to dumping to our batch wastewater treatment system where we pH adjust and precipitate metals using carbamamide (sulfide). Our limit on Ni concentration is 3.0 mg/liter before discharge to our city POTW and is being reduced to 0.5 mg/liter in 2 years. The electrogrinding process produces about 200 gal of waste solution per week. Thanks for your input. J.L.
Answer:
In my opinion, reduction of nickel via electrowinning may not be feasible for three reasons, although I would appreciate readers’ input about this. First, the high concentration of iron may interfere with the plating out process. Secondly, much of the nickel may be suspended solid matter rather than an ion and, therefore, would not plate out. Lastly, you would only be recovering, at best, about 1 lb of nickel a week, making electrowinning not very economically attractive.
I assume that this waste material is causing problems in your wastewater treatment system. If so, it is likely due to the emulsifier that is trying to keep contaminants in suspension in your wastewater treatment system in the same way it works in your process. There are a number of chemistries that could deactivate the emulsifier. Contact your chemical supplier. Also, you may want to set up a separate batch tank to pretreat the solution before sending it to wastewater treatment.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.
-
Novel Wastewater Treatment Targets Micropollutants
Swiss wastewater treatment technology provider Oxyle specializes in advanced wastewater treatment for removal of highly persistent micropollutants such as PFAS.
