Parts Cleaning Conference
Published

Lead Out of Wastewater

Is there any modification to our existing batch wastewater system that could help us achieve compliance?

Share

Q. We recently received a new plating contract for machined parts. In order to get the parts ready for the specified electroless plating, the parts are soak cleaned, electrocleaned and muriatic acid activated. Shortly after we started running this job, the city sampled our wastewater as part of their normal procedure and found that our lead concentration was over our wastewater discharge limit of 0.4 mg/liter. After some exhaustive investigation, we found fairly high lead concentrations in our electrocleaner and muriatic acid process solutions. After further discussions with our customers, our new customer informed us that their steel parts do have some lead in the alloy in order to help with their machining.

We have a batch treatment system for our concentrated wastes, and our rinse waters receive only pH adjustment. After further testing, we have concluded that while the lead concentration in our rinse waters does increase when we run these parts, it is still within our discharge limit. However, when we process a batch of our concentrated wastes, our lead limit is exceeded. Is there any modification to our existing batch wastewater system that could help us achieve compliance? C.Y

 

A. While the leaded stock that your customer uses improves their process, it sure can give job shops such as yours wastewater headaches. Since in the electrocleaner, the part is the anode and the current flows from anode to cathode, surfacial lead can be pulled off of the part. You may want to consider turning off the electrocleaner when processing these parts and operate two soak cleaners in series if sufficient part cleaning can still be accomplished. The muriatic acid (aka hydrochloric acid) is dissolving some of the lead off of the part during acid activation.

Removal of lead from your concentrated wastes by neutralization and precipitation is not difficult but does require several steps to achieve consistently good results below your limit. One of the challenges is the minimum solubility of lead hydroxide is about 4 mg/liter. While precipitation with other metals, such as iron, will reduce the solubility further, we have found that one must form a lead sulfide or lead carbonate precipitate in order to consistently achieve compliance with your wastewater discharge limit.

While sulfide precipitation of lead will certainly achieve compliance, we would not recommend it due to its “rotten egg” odor unless, for some reason, carbonate precipitation is not successful.

Here is our suggested procedure:

 

  • If at all possible, neutralize the waste acid using 
    your waste cleaners; the high iron in the waste 
    acid seems to help minimize the cleaner's ten-
    dency to negatively impact metal precipita-
    tion.
  • Adjust wastewater pH to between 7.0 and 8.0 
    (for every gallon of 10% muriatic acid, about 
    0.15 gallons of 50% caustic or 0.4 gallons of 25% 
    caustic is needed).
  • With mixing, add sodium carbonate (aka soda 
    ash) at a rate of approximately one pound so-
    dium carbonate per one pound of lead to be 
    treated (mg/liter lead x 8.34 x gallons x 10-6 = 
    pounds of lead).
  • If needed, add caustic to raise pH to around 9.0.
  • Add an anionic polymer for flocculation.
  • Allow solids to settle and decant clear wastewater or pump entire batch to filter press.

Before implementing, we recommend that you perform this batch treatment on a lab scale in order to determine your specific sodium carbonate dosage and final pH.

 

 

Luster-On Products
Anodizing Conference & Expo 2024
Gardner Intelligence
Koch Finishing Systems
Metal Pretreatment Technology
Mocap Masking Caps Plugs Tapes
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
Fischer Technology, Inc.
PF Podcast
Parts Cleaning Conference
find masking products online
Filtration

Related Content

nasf

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters - April 2022-March 2023

This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers project work from April 2022 to March 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago.  The overall objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater.  Initial results for the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts are discussed.    

Read More

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 5th Quarterly Report

This paper covers a research grant at the University of Georgia - Griffin on developing electrochemical approaches to remove PFASs present in plating wastewaters, under the direction of Professor Qingguo (Jack) Huang.  This fifth quarter report assessed eight PFAAs most commonly found in wastewaters, by electro-oxidation with a Ti4O7 anode across a range of anodic potentials in solutions of different compositions and at varying operating conditions.  

Read More

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report

This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.  

Read More

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 6th Quarterly Report

The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation.  This sixth quarter report covers the continued assessment of eight perfluoroalkyl acids PFAAs most commonly found in wastewaters, by electro-oxidation with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode across a range of anodic potentials in solutions, exploring the reaction mechanisms.  To summarize, the PFAAs start to exhibit degradation behavior when the anodic potential reaches a level where water oxidation occurs, suggesting that the hydroxyl free radicals generated via water oxidation play a role in PFAA degradation.

Read More

Read Next

automotive

The 2024 Ford Mustang: All the Colors Available

Although Chevrolet has announced the end of the Camaro and Dodge is offering “Last Call” editions of the Charger and Challenger, the Ford Mustang is launching to its seventh generation.

Read More
Powder Coating

Powder Coating 4.0: Smarter, Faster, More Efficient and Connected

New tools reduce cost and waste, lower manufacturing footprint of powder coating operations.

Read More
regulation

Episode 42: An Interview with Robin Deal, Hubbard-Hall

Hubbard-Hall wastewater treatment specialist Robin Deal discusses the latest trends in wastewater management. 

Read More
Non-Cyanide Silver Plating, AMS 2411J