NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – 7th & 8th Quarter Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the seventh and eighth quarters of project work (October 2021-March 2022) at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The major activities reported are: (1) to investigate 6:2 FTS oxidation, a common replacement compound for PFOS in the electroplating industry, and (2) PFAS oxidation in both a wastewater sample procured from an electroplating facility and in synthetic solutions.
By Brian Chaplin*
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Editor’s Note: This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the seventh and eighth quarters of project work (October 2021-March 2022) at the University of Illinois at Chicago. A printable PDF version of this report is available by clicking HERE. A listing of previous reports to date is provided at the end of this report.
Part 1 – 7th Quarter Report (October-December 2021)
Summary
Part 2 – 8th Quarter Report (January-March 2022)
Summary
This quarter, a wastewater sample was procured from an electroplating facility, and experiments were conducted to investigate PFAS oxidation in both the wastewater sample and in synthetic solutions. Analysis of the sample determined that 6:2 FTS was the primary PFAS detected at a concentration of 220 μg/L (~0.5 μM). The ionic content was mainly comprised of NaCl and Na2SO4 salts, and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the sample was ~ 50 mg/L, which was attributed to other organic compounds besides PFAS.
![](https://d2n4wb9orp1vta.cloudfront.net/cms/brand/PF/2022-PF/2214_Table_11.jpg;maxWidth=385)
Table 1 - General water quality parameters for electroplating wastewater sample.
The wastewater sample was treated with the Ti4O7 reactive electrochemical membrane (REM), with a residence time of ~11 sec. Results for 6:2 FTS oxidation are still pending LC-MS analysis. However, the COD removal at potentials of 2.2, 2.9, and 3.6 VSHE was 10, 24, 83%, respectively. A synthetic solution with a similar ionic content to the real wastewater was prepared and spiked with 0.5 μM of 6:2 FTS. Once again, PFAS analysis is still pending, but fluoride production in permeate samples increased as a function of potential and reached as high as 4.9 μM (i.e., 75% defluorination) at a potential of 3.6 VSHE. In addition, a synthetic sample with a similar ionic strength to the wastewater was prepared but with an elevated 6:2 FTS concentration (40 μM). This sample was used to represent a PFAS concentrate from electroplating wastewater that could result from nanofiltration or foam fractionation. Results showed 66, 78, and 83% oxidation of 6:2 FTS at potentials of 2.2, 2.9, and 3.6 VSHE, respectively. Product analysis indicated the formation of short chain PFAS (i.e., PFHpA, PFHxA, PFPeA, and PFBA) at concentrations less than 1.35 μM. These results indicate that concentrating PFAS in wastewater may be a more efficient treatment strategy and that the residence time in the REM needs to be increased to prevent the accumulation of short chain PFAS byproducts.
Results
The electroplating wastewater was analyzed for PFAS and general water quality parameters. The total PFAS concentration was 228 μg/L, which consisted of 220 μg/L 6:2 FTS and low concentrations of 4:2 FTS (0.81 μg/L), PFHpA (0.38 μg/L), PFHxA (1.4 μg/L), and PFOS (2.2 μg/L). The general water quality parameters are listed in Table 1. Results indicate that the ionic content consists primarily of NaCl and Na2SO4 salts, the solution pH = 7.35, and COD = 50 mg/L.
![](https://d2n4wb9orp1vta.cloudfront.net/cms/brand/PF/2022-PF/2214_Figure_11.jpg;maxWidth=385)
Figure 1 - Chemical oxygen demand (COD) of wastewater as a function of potential in the REM system. Residence time ~ 11 sec.
Electrochemical oxidation of the wastewater sample was tested in the REM system. The flux was held constant at 240 L/m2/hr, which corresponded to ~11 sec residence time in the reactor. Applied potentials of 2.2, 2.9, and 3.6 VSHE were tested, and PFAS removal is still pending LC-MS analysis. The COD analysis of the wastewater is shown in Figure 1, and results indicated it decreased by 10%, 24%, and 83% at potentials of 2.2, 2.9, and 3.6 VSHE, respectively. Indicating the REM was effective for bulk oxidation of the organics present in the wastewater.
![](https://d2n4wb9orp1vta.cloudfront.net/cms/brand/PF/2022-PF/2214_Figure_21.jpg;maxWidth=385)
Figure 2 - Fluoride analysis for 0.5 μM 6:2 FTS oxidation in synthetic wastewater sample as a function of potential. Residence time ~ 11 sec.
An additional experiment was also conducted with a synthetic wastewater with 0.5 μM 6:2 FTS and a similar ionic content as Table 1, but without the bulk organics. The PFAS analyses is once again pending LC-MS analysis. However, fluoride analysis is shown in Figure 2. Results indicate that fluoride increases as a function of potential and reached a concentration of 4.9 mM, which corresponds to 75% defluorination of 6:2 FTS. This calculation was based on the fact that 1 mole of 6:2 FTS contains 13 moles of fluorine. Chlorate and perchlorate were also monitored, as they can form from chloride oxidation and have undesirable health risks. Perchlorate was below the detection limit (~1 μg/L) and chlorate was detected at concentrations of 1.2, 23, and 95 mg/L at potentials of 2.2, 2.9, and 3.6 VSHE, respectively. Chlorate is not currently regulated, but the EPA has set a health reference level (HRL) at 210 μg/L. Since the chlorate concentrations are much higher than the HRL, the water may need further treatment depending on discharge permitting.
![](https://d2n4wb9orp1vta.cloudfront.net/cms/brand/PF/2022-PF/2214_Figure_3a1.jpg;maxWidth=385)
Figure 3 - (a) Concentration of 6:2 FTS as a function of the applied potential. Initial concentration of 6:2 FTS = 40 μM; (b) products from 6:2 FTS as a function of the applied potential. Residence time is ~11 sec.
An additional synthetic sample was prepared with a similar ionic strength as the real wastewater, but with an elevated 6:2 FTS concentration (i.e., 40 μM). This sample was used to represent a concentrated PFAS sample that may be generated during nanofiltration, foam fractionization, or another separation method. Oxidation experiments indicated that 66%, 78%, and 83% removal of 6:2 FTS at potentials of 2.2, 2.9, and 3.6 VSHE, respectively (Figure 3a). Product analysis indicated the formation of short chain PFAS (Figure 3b).
![](https://d2n4wb9orp1vta.cloudfront.net/cms/brand/PF/2022-PF/2214_Figure_3b1.jpg;maxWidth=385)
For example, the highest concentrations of PFHpA, PFHxA, PFPeA, and PFBA formed at a potential of 2.9 VSHE, with concentrations of 1.4, 1.0, 0.7, 0.06 μM, respectively. The concentrations of all of these PFAS decreased at 3.6 VSHE to concentrations less than 0.5 μM. These results indicate that concentrating PFAS in wastewater may be a viable and efficient treatment strategy and that the residence time in the REM needs to be increased to prevent the accumulation of short chain PFAS byproducts.
Previous reports
1. Quarters 1-5 (April 2019-June 2021): Summary: NASF Report in Products Finishing; NASF Surface Technology White Papers, 86 (1), 19 (October 2021); Full paper (With Project Introduction): http://short.pfonline.com/NASF21Oct1.
2. Quarter 6 (July-September 2021): Summary: NASF Report in Products Finishing; NASF Surface Technology White Papers, 86 (4), 19 (January 2022); Full paper: http://short.pfonline.com/NASF22Jan2.
About the author
![](https://d2n4wb9orp1vta.cloudfront.net/cms/brand/PF/2022-PF/2214_Chaplin1.jpg;maxWidth=385)
Dr. Brian P. Chaplin is Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering, at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He holds a B. Civil Engineering (1999) and an M.S. (2003) in Civil Engineering from the University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering (2007) from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
* Dr. Brian Chaplin, Associate Professor
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
University of Illinois at Chicago
221 Chemical Engineering Building
810 S. Clinton St.
Chicago, IL 60607
Office: (312) 996-0288
Mobile: (217) 369-5529
E-mail: chaplin@uic.edu
Related Content
EPA Readying Fall Nationwide PFAS Survey of Metal Finishing Industry to Inform New Water Discharge Rule
NASF continues discussions with US EPA on the agency’s plans for a nationwide survey of the metal finishing industry on its use of PFAS. NASF plans to review the draft survey and provide feedback to the agency prior to its distribution. Surveys will likely go to a wide range of job shop and captive operations and are scheduled to be sent out in the fall.
Read MoreZinc Phosphate: Questions and Answers
Our experts share specific questions about zinc phosphate and pretreatment
Read MoreNASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 10th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams. This report covers the 10th quarter of work (April-June 2023). Here, we examine the effect of surface fluorination of Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation performance in terms of energy performance as well as formation of chlorate and perchlorate when chloride is present in the solution. The full paper on this work can be accessed and printed at short.pfonline.com/NASF24Feb2.
Read MoreNovel Wastewater Treatment Targets Micropollutants
Swiss wastewater treatment technology provider Oxyle specializes in advanced wastewater treatment for removal of highly persistent micropollutants such as PFAS.
Read MoreRead Next
Episode 42: An Interview with Robin Deal, Hubbard-Hall
Hubbard-Hall wastewater treatment specialist Robin Deal discusses the latest trends in wastewater management.
Read MorePowder Coating 4.0: Smarter, Faster, More Efficient and Connected
New tools reduce cost and waste, lower manufacturing footprint of powder coating operations.
Read MoreThe 2024 Ford Mustang: All the Colors Available
Although Chevrolet has announced the end of the Camaro and Dodge is offering “Last Call” editions of the Charger and Challenger, the Ford Mustang is launching to its seventh generation.
Read More