Nitrate Compound Reporting
Question: A colleague of mine who owns a metal finishing facility has just received notice from U.S.
Question:
A colleague of mine who owns a metal finishing facility has just received notice from U.S. EPA that he may be in violation of the Toxic Release Inventory reporting requirements for nitrate compounds since he uses nitric acid in his operation. U.S.EPA states that his fine may be as much as $50,000. I manage a job shop plating operation that also uses nitric acid, and we have reported nitric acid on our annual Form R reports. This is the first time we have heard of reporting nitrate compounds and are concerned that we may be fined. Do you have any suggestions what our next steps should be? S.C.
Answer:
While I already covered this issue in my February 2000 column, this issue is worth discussing again. Your colleague has been caught by U.S.EPA’s recent enforcement program that is focusing on the nonreporting of nitrate compound releases. U.S.EPA is searching through its database of facilities that submitted a Form R for nitric acid but not for nitrate compounds, looking for those who report treating enough nitric acid on-site to warrant a possible nonreporting violation for nitrate compounds.
Nitrate compounds were added to the SARA 313 Toxic Release Inventory chemical list in 1995, with its first reporting date being July 1, 1996. When nitric acid is neutralized with sodium hydroxide, sodium nitrate is inadvertently“manufactured” in the wastewater pretreatment system. If more than 25,000 lb of sodium nitrate are “manufactured,” the nitrate compounds must be reported on the Form R. Since one mole of sodium nitrate (NaNO3) is formed when one mole of nitric acid (HNO3) is neutralized, 1.35 lb of sodium nitrate is formed for every pound of nitric acid neutralized. Therefore, to exceed the 25,000-lb threshold, more that 18,518 lb per year of nitric acid would have to be treated by the wastewater pretreatment system. The amount of nitric acid treated can be estimated by this equation: pounds of nitric acid to wwt = (pounds of nitric acid used) – (pounds of waste nitric acid disposed off-site) – (pounds of nitric acid air emissions). Since the final pH of finishing wastewater pretreatment system effluent is above 6.0, 100% neutralization is assumed, according to U.S.EPA guidance.
There are two guidance documents that finishers will find helpful in dealing with this issue: “Toxic Release Inventory: List of Toxic Chemicals with the Water Dissociable Nitrate Compounds Category and Guidance for Reporting,” EPA 745-R-96-004, revised May 1996; and “SARA 313: Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know: Estimating Releases for Mineral Acid Discharges Using pH Measurements,” U.S.EPA, June 1991. You should be able to obtain these publications through the EPA’s RCRA, Superfund hotline at 800-535-0202.
If you discover that you should have reported nitrate compounds, I urge you to immediately contact your environmental attorney to plan how to inform U.S.EPA; U.S.EPA has a voluntary disclosure policy regarding violations discovered during self-auditing activities. This policy contains specific criteria for its use and can be found at www.epa.gov/oeca/auditpol.html. If successfully invoked, self-disclosure can relieve a facility from fines and penalties, except for any “economic advantage.” However, upon receiving a notice of possible violation from U.S.EPA, you cannot be covered under this policy.
Related Content
Top 5 Areas to Consider Automation of Plating Operations
Automation for finishing operations can lead to improvements in process time, repeatability and consistency of quality. Yet, processes that make sense to explore for these operational efficiencies may not always be readily apparent.
Read MoreNASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
Read MoreNASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 6th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation. This sixth quarter report covers the continued assessment of eight perfluoroalkyl acids PFAAs most commonly found in wastewaters, by electro-oxidation with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode across a range of anodic potentials in solutions, exploring the reaction mechanisms. To summarize, the PFAAs start to exhibit degradation behavior when the anodic potential reaches a level where water oxidation occurs, suggesting that the hydroxyl free radicals generated via water oxidation play a role in PFAA degradation.
Read MoreNASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 7th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation. Our last report described the results from experiments of EO with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode on the degradation of eight perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs). In this seven quarter report, we describe work to further explore how the degradation of different PFAAs are related to their molecular structures.
Read MoreRead Next
Masking Solutions for Medical Applications
According to Custom Fabricating and Supplies, a cleanroom is ideal for converting, die cutting, laminating, slitting, packaging and assembly of medical-grade products.
Read MoreDelivering Increased Benefits to Greenhouse Films
Baystar's Borstar technology is helping customers deliver better, more reliable production methods to greenhouse agriculture.
Read MoreA ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago
The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.
Read More