Protection from Hex Chrome
OSHA’s relatively new hexavalent chromium standard remains somewhat confusing when trying to implement at our plant. Could you provide some insight on how to obtain compliance?
Q: OSHA’s relatively new hexavalent chromium standard remains somewhat confusing when trying to implement at our plant. Could you provide some insight on how to obtain compliance? S.H.
A: We could easily fill many pages to answer your question. To keep it simple, we recommend a five-step approach for compliance with the Hexavalent Chromium Standard, 29 CFR 1026.
First, evaluate your plant for potential areas of hex chrome exposure. Operations such as chrome plating, chromate dip baths, metal spray and stainless steel welding can lead to airborne exposures. If you are unsure if hex chrome exists in your plant, consult with your suppliers or examine material safety data sheets. Keep in mind that “hot work” activities, such as welding and thermal cutting, can create hex chrome as a result of oxidation.
Exposure Data | Exposure Monitoring Requirements | Respirators Required | Medical Surveillance | Regulated Areas | Hygienic Practices |
<0.5 ug/m3 | standard not applicable. | ||||
0.5 < 2.5 (action level) µg/m3 | NA | NA | NA | NA | good house-keeping |
2.5 < 5.0 µg/m3 | every 6 months | NA | annual | NA | washing/changing/ house-keeping |
5.0 (PEL) & >mg/m3 | every 3 months | Yes | Annual | demarcate area(s) | washing/ changing/ housekeeping/ engineering controls |
Second, determine your employees’ exposure concentration (µg/m3 ) in order to determine applicability of the standard. Exposure levels must be determined by one of two methods: personal monitoring or using objective data to determine an 8-hr time-weighted average. If you decide to utilize personal monitoring, we recommend the sampling be designed and supervised by an industrial hygienist. “Objective data” means data, other than employee monitoring, that demonstrates expected employee exposure to hex chrome; information that can serve as “objective data” includes industry-wide air monitoring surveys, trade association data, or calculations based on the composition, chemical and physical properties of the chemical as well as operating conditions of the process. This data must closely resemble your workplace conditions. If exposures are determined to be less than 0.5 µg/m3 , than this standard does not apply.
When exposures are determined to exceed the 0.5 µg/m3 applicability time-weighted average, utilize the following table to assist in obtaining compliance depending upon exposure:
As you can see, due to the ongoing monitoring and medical surveillance requirements, it’s highly desirable that workplace changes occur to get exposures to below the Action Level of 2.5 µg/m3 .
We’ve found this feasible by implementing best management practices to provide employees maximum protection:
- Verify proper ventilation of hex chrome tanks
- Investigate better ways to rinse parts as they are removed from baths to avoid airborne droplets
- Remove parts from tank baths more slowly
- Reduce cross air drafts from doors or fans
- Use recirculation pumps instead of air for tank agitation
- Investigate use of wetting agents to lower surface tension of the bath (e.g., fume suppressants)
- Evaluate the use of liquid chrome additives in place of dry flake materials
- Avoid dry broom sweeping of floor; clean area by vacuum with HEPA-filter, wet mop area floors, or use oil-based floor sweep absorbent
- Verify proper PPE such as rubber gloves, apron, safety glasses, and boots are used appropriately
- Train authorized employees on use of the PPE and the hazards of hex chrom,
- Perform routine inspections of the regulated area to verify PPE is utilized, and inspect for chrome sores on hands and arms
- Do not permit employees to wear clothing or carry equipment contaminated with hex chrome from the facility
- Place contaminated items that are to leave the plant (i.e., laundering) into containers that are leak-proof, sealed, and labeled in accordance with the Hazard Communication Standard
- Inform your laundry provider of the potential hazards associated with hex chrome
- Provide a changing room that has 1 shower per 10 employees and can prevent cross contamination of work and street clothing; keeping clothing in sealed containers will help
- Encourage employees to take a shower prior to leaving, or at a minimum, thoroughly wash hands, arms, and face with warm water and soap
- Encourage employees to take a shower prior to leaving, or at a minimum, thoroughly wash hands, arms, and face with warm water and soap
- Frequently wash hands and arms, particularly prior to breaks
- Prohibit eating, drinking, smoking, and food storage within regulated areas
- Store containers of hex chrome materials only in a designated area
- Dispose of accumulated items/soils by spill-proof container and in accordance with state and USEPA requirements
- Provide annual physicals for hard chrome plating employees in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1026(k) (Hexavalent
- Chrome Standard) and 29 CFR 1910.124(h)(4) (Coating and Dipping Operations)
Maintain on file exposure determination, monitoring results, and medical surveillance records in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020 (Medical Records).
Fourth, provide ongoing Hazard Communication Training. Make certain employees are aware of the contents of the Hex
Chrome standard and its availability for their review.
Fifth, inform employees of the exposure results. Employers must notify each affected employee if exposure determination indicates their exposure exceeds the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 5.0 µg/m3. Additionally, if the PEL is exceeded, employees must be provided with information related to corrective actions the employer is taking to reduce exposures to below the PEL.
For additional guidance, review OSHA’s “Small Entity Compliance Guide for the Hexavalent Chromium Standards” www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA_small_entity_comp.pdf or type in “Hexavalent Chromium” in the search window at www.osha.gov.
Related Content
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 9th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams. This report covers the ninth quarter of work (January-March 2023). In this report, we describe our work on evaluating the performance of PFAS degradation by electrooxidation using surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes in batch mode.
Read MoreTop 5 Areas to Consider Automation of Plating Operations
Automation for finishing operations can lead to improvements in process time, repeatability and consistency of quality. Yet, processes that make sense to explore for these operational efficiencies may not always be readily apparent.
Read MoreNASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters - April 2022-March 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers project work from April 2022 to March 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The overall objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Initial results for the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts are discussed.
Read MoreNASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.
Read MoreRead Next
Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining
Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.
Read MoreEpisode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions
Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.
Read MoreDelivering Increased Benefits to Greenhouse Films
Baystar's Borstar technology is helping customers deliver better, more reliable production methods to greenhouse agriculture.
Read More