More blasting. Less part handling.
Published

Reactive Waste or Not Revisited

I would like more information on the organic sulfide precipitant described in the November 2006 column, “Reactive Waste or Not." Does it really work better than conventional neutralization/precipitation using acid/caustic and a flocculant?

Share

Q. In your November 2006 column, “Reactive Waste or Not,” C.W. stated they use an organic sulfide precipitant. I would like more information on this wastewater precipitant containing an organic sulfide. What brand names is it sold under? Who sells it? Does it really work better than conventional neutralization/precipitation using acid/caustic and a flocculant? R.K.

 

A. As far as your first two questions, PRODUCTS FINISHING editorial policy prevents me from mentioning a specific brand product or supplier. I would be very surprised if your current wastewater treatment chemical supplier does not offer an organic sulfide precipitant, but if not, refer to the 2007 PRODUCTS FINISHING DIRECTORY & TECHNOLOGY GUIDE under several titles: Flocculants, Polyelectrolytes; Pollution-Control chemicals, heavy-metal removal; and Pollution-Control chemicals, sulfide precipitation. You can also find the listings online at www.pfonline.com/suppliers.html. Basically, organic sulfides are any compound that contains sulfide (S=) and carbon, although for wastewater treatment these are typically a carbamate compound, such as dithiocarbamate (DTC).

To answer your last question, I would say generally sulfides will “work better” than conventional hydroxide precipitation, but it depends and there are drawbacks.

The main reason why sulfides can work better than hydroxides is because of its much lower solubility for heavy metals typically found in metal finishing wastewaters, except for chrome. For example, the theoretical solubility of zinc hydroxide is 11.0 x 10-1 mg/L and zinc sulfide is 2.3 x 10-7 mg/L; as you can see, sulfides can typically produce wastewaters with much lower metal concentrations.

The advantages of sulfide precipitation are

  • Excellent removal of metals in presence of che-
    lating and complexing compounds,
  • Depending upon existing chemistry and waste-
    water characteristic, can reduce filter cake volume
    by 20  - 70%,
  • Solids typically dewater easier in the filter press
    since the floc particle is more compact and less
    gelatinous as compared to hydroxide,
  • Since most metal finishing wastewaters are
    acidic, may be able to reduce caustic usage by
    reducing pH control setpoint, and
  • Will reduce hex chrome to trivalent chrome.                                                                   

 

The disadvantages of sulfide precipitation are

  • Rotten egg odor; while the liquid precipitant
    will likely have a masking agent or perfume
    added, there is still a noticeable odor,
  • Unless you can achieve significant filter press
    cake volume reduction and reduce caustic use,
    sulfide precipitation is likely more expensive,
  • Organic sulfide reduction of hex chrome takes
    a very high dose and lots of time,
  • Since organic sulfides are typically pesticides,
    you need to carefully watch dosage so as to prevent
    excessive compound to the sewer and possibly
    interfere with sewage treatment plant,
  • Controlling dose can be tricky; we have seen
    some pretreatment systems successfully use ORP
    controllers while others not,
  • If wastewater's pH falls below two, carbon disul-
    fide, a toxic gas is released; while plant venti-
    lation will likely not make this an issue, if carbon
    disulfide deposits on parts before plating, you
    will experience a very high reject rate,
  • If you wastewater contains high organics, your
    required dose will increase since organic sul-
    fides prefer other organics rather than heavy
    metals.  and
  • Sulfide released to the air will react with any ex-
    posed copper, turning its surface black.

Typically, we have used organic sulfides in those situations where we needed to achieve compliance that hydroxide precipitation was not achieving. In most of these cases, we utilized it as a metal scavenger after hydroxide precipitation, adding it into the floc tank before the clarifier or between the clarifier and polishing filter. Only one of our clients which had a hydroxide based system achieving compliance found that, after a one month trial, the organic sulfide precipitant saved money, on net.

R.K., this will give you good guidance if you decide to pursue organic sulfide precipitation.

Anodizing Conference & Expo 2024
Luster-On Products
Koch Finishing Systems
New Acid-Free Bright Nickel Process
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
The Finishing Industry’s Education and Networking Resource
Gardner Intelligence
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
Filtration
Parts Cleaning Conference
PF Podcast
Fischer Technology, Inc.

Related Content

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters - April 2022-March 2023

This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers project work from April 2022 to March 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago.  The overall objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater.  Initial results for the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts are discussed.    

Read More

NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 9th Quarterly Report

The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams.  This report covers the ninth quarter of work (January-March 2023).  In this report, we describe our work on evaluating the performance of PFAS degradation by electrooxidation using surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes in batch mode.

Read More
nasf

EPA Readying Fall Nationwide PFAS Survey of Metal Finishing Industry to Inform New Water Discharge Rule

NASF continues discussions with US EPA on the agency’s plans for a nationwide survey of the metal finishing industry on its use of PFAS. NASF plans to review the draft survey and provide feedback to the agency prior to its distribution. Surveys will likely go to a wide range of job shop and captive operations and are scheduled to be sent out in the fall.

Read More

Ultrafiltration Membranes, Filter Elements for Improved Industrial Water Reuse

Ultrafiltration membranes help with water reuse in a variety of applications.

Read More

Read Next

Powder Coating

Powder Coating 4.0: Smarter, Faster, More Efficient and Connected

New tools reduce cost and waste, lower manufacturing footprint of powder coating operations.

Read More
automotive

The 2024 Ford Mustang: All the Colors Available

Although Chevrolet has announced the end of the Camaro and Dodge is offering “Last Call” editions of the Charger and Challenger, the Ford Mustang is launching to its seventh generation.

Read More
regulation

Episode 42: An Interview with Robin Deal, Hubbard-Hall

Hubbard-Hall wastewater treatment specialist Robin Deal discusses the latest trends in wastewater management. 

Read More
More blasting. Less part handling.