ENGINEERED PAINT BOOTHS & FINISHING SOLUTIONS
Published

A Toxic Debate

PF Digital Dispatch

In the run up to the Washington Forum, EPA regulation is in the spotlight, and finishers are getting some bad press.

Share

In the run up to the Washington Forum, EPA regulation is in the spotlight, and finishers are getting some bad press. Recent coverage in the Chicago Tribune and the Cleveland Plain Dealer has focused on the presence of certain perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in finishing plants' wastewater streams. Typically used to suppress hex chrome fumes in finishing operations, the unregulated PFCs have thus far served as a safe, cost-effective means of reducing both air emissions and workplace exposure levels. Bottom line: What seemed like a solution to air pollution issues has potentially created a water pollution problem. And finishers are stuck between a rock and a hard place.

A 2008 study of 11 finishing plants—four in Cleveland and seven in Chicago—has determined that releases from decorative chromium electroplating facilities could be a widespread source of PFCs in the environment—with potentially unhealthy levels filtering into our drinking water, our wildlife and our bodies. Although the study was too small to be statistically relevant, it's been picked up by national news outlets and has brought national attention to an issue our industry has already been hard at work on for years.

According to Christian Richter, executive director of the National Association for Surface Finishing, the NASF has long been proactively searching for safe and cost-effective replacements for certain PFCs. "Although currently there is no regulatory limit for certain PFC compounds in either drinking water or wastewater,” he says, “the industry's chemical suppliers have continued to research, test and commercialize alternatives for PFC substances of concern."

Interested in learning more about PFCs? Read the April issue of Products Finishing for a history of the substance and what effects its regulation may have on your company. You can also attend the talk "Industry-EPA Collaboration - Next Steps." EPA has agreed to participate in key industry technical and policy sessions on fume suppressants at the upcoming NASF Washington Forum (April 27-28, 2010) and at the NASF SUR/FIN conference in Grand Rapids, MI (June 14-17, 2010).
 

Related Content

  • NASF's SUR/FIN 2023: Bringing the Surface Finishing Industry Together

    SUR/FIN 2023 is an opportunity for those in the surface finishing industry to expand their knowledge, expertise and network.

  • Tin-Zinc Alloy Electroplating and Its Corrosion Behavior

     An NASF/AESF Foundation Research Program Retrospective 

  • Non-PFAS Wetting Agents for Decorative Chromium(VI) Plating

    This article is based on a presentation given at NASF SUR/FIN 2022, in Rosemont, Illinois, in Session 6, Responses to PFAS / PFOA.  It follows the case study of three facilities’ conversion from PFAS-containing wetting agents to non-PFAS equivalents, eliminating PFAS and moving forward with a smaller and more sustainable environmental footprint.  The journey of conversion from PFAS-containing wetting agents in both chromic-sulfuric etch and hexavalent decorative plating tanks can be complicated and winding due to deep rooted standard industry practices, as well as state and federal regulations.  Outlined here is a clear course of action that led to eliminating PFAS from the facilities’ wetting agent strategies. 

Powder Coating Institute
UV Powder Coating  for Heat Sensitive Substrates
Steelman Industries Inc.
Your Best Finish Starts With Us!
Powder Coating Institute Certification
ENGINEERED PAINT BOOTHS & FINISHING SOLUTIONS
complete finishing application systems
The Finishing Industry’s Education and Networking Resource
UV Cured Powder for Heat Sensitive Substrates