Determining the Proper Material for an Electroless Nickel Plating Tank
The stability of your electroless nickel (EN) bath may require one type of tank over another, says Mike Aleksinas of MetalChem.
Q: We are an existing plating shop in the Midwest and we are considering purchasing an additional electroless nickel plating tank for our facility. What suggestions do you have for the ideal EN tank material?
A: That is an excellent question and careful consideration should be made on what material is ideal for both the EN chemistry and your company.
Because most EN chemistries operate at elevated temperatures exceeding 185°F and also have a tendency to plateout on the tank walls, the choice of material that can be used is limited.
The most popular construction materials used today are solid propylene, stainless steel or steel tanks with a liner such as 25 mil PVC.
Other materials have been used in the past, but with limited success. These include fiberglass-reinforced resins, polyethylene and steel coated with various coatings.
Each of the most popular materials used in the field do have their own advantages and disadvantages. Depending on your company's requirements or concerns, one tank material may be more advantageous than another.
A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each material is as follows:
Stress-Relieved Polypropylene
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
1. Inexpensive to fabricate |
1. Tends to oxidize and become brittle |
|
2. Minimizes plateout |
2. Needs to be stripped by nitric acid periodically |
|
|
3. Expands with high temperatures, leading to leaks and cracks |
|
|
4. Short tank life |
Stainless Steel
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
1. Ideal for larger tanks greater than 500 gallons |
1. Expensive to fabricate |
|
2. Long tank life |
2. Parts must not come into contact with tank walls |
|
3. Reduces nitric stripping |
|
|
4. Thermal expansion not an issue |
|
|
5. Reduces the waste treatment costs associated with nitric acid |
|
PVC Bag Liners in Steel Tanks
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
1. Low cost to manufacture |
1. Replacement of bag liners is an ongoing expense |
|
2. Eliminates nitric stripping completely |
2. Filtration is difficult |
|
3. Lower waste treatment costs |
3. Limits type of heat source |
|
|
4. Disposed liners may become a problem in the future |
|
|
|
All three construction materials work and are used successfully in the field today. If cost is your main concern, then polypropylene or PVC liners may be best for you. If the elimination or reduction of nitric acid is important to you, then stainless steel or PVC liners may be best for you.
Stainless steel tanks offer the most advantages. The cost may be 20-25% more, but the longevity of the equipment will pay for itself over time.
Recent advancements, such as adding a passivation system to a stainless steel tank, can further minimize the use of nitric acid and, in some cases, nearly eliminate its use completely.
As always, it is wise to discuss with your EN supplier what type of tank is best for their chemistry. The stability of their EN bath may require one type of tank over another.
Mike Aleksinas is the president of MetalChem. He can be reached at mike@metalchem-inc.com or 864-877-6175.
Related Content
-
Possibilities From Electroplating 3D Printed Plastic Parts
Adding layers of nickel or copper to 3D printed polymer can impart desired properties such as electrical conductivity, EMI shielding, abrasion resistance and improved strength — approaching and even exceeding 3D printed metal, according to RePliForm.
-
Successful South African Plater Beating the Odds
Remaining focused on quality and reliability, Team Plating Works stays profitable in a volatile and challenging economy.
-
Trivalent Chrome Overview
As the finishing industry begins to move away from the use of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, what factors should finishers consider as they make new investments? Mark Schario, chief technology officer for Columbia Chemical offers a helpful overview of this complicated topic.
