Fischer measurement technology
Published

EPA Moving on PFAS Regulatory Actions for Drinking Water

Agency requesting the Office of Management to review its proposed regulatory determinations for two types of PFAS.

Laura Heusel, Attorney, Butler Snow & Trudy Fischer, Attorney, Butler Snow

Share

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  is moving forward on the drinking water component of its PFAS Action Plan by requesting the Office of Management to review its proposed regulatory determinations for two types of PFAS. This is a definite step toward developing formal drinking water standards called Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the EPA can legally enforce how much of a chemical is allowed in drinking water supplies only if there is an established MCL.

two attorneys standing

To date, the EPA has not set an MCL for any type of PFAS, but has established a lifetime Health Advisory Level for drinking water at 70 parts per trillion for two of the PFAS chemicals, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Health Advisory Levels are nonenforceable and nonregulatory, and provide technical information to state agencies and other public health officials on health effects, analytical methodologies and treatment technologies associated with drinking water contamination. In the interim, some states have set their own state-specific enforceable drinking water standards that are as low as 10 parts per trillion for some types of PFAS.

The EPA regulates public drinking water through the Safe Drinking Water Act by monitoring for more than 90 drinking water contaminants with MCLs. That list has never included any of the PFAS compounds. However, as a component of its PFAS Action Plan released in February 2019, the EPA stated that it would begin the administrative process for establishing enforceable drinking water standards by the year’s end. In November, the EPA initiated this process by sending its proposal for a regulatory determination to the Office of Management and Budget. In this proposal EPA stated that it “intends to make preliminary regulatory determinations for PFOA and PFOS . . . by the end of 2019.” In the proposed regulatory determination that is to follow, EPA will consider three primary factors: (1) whether the contaminant may have adverse effects on the health of persons; (2) whether the contaminant is known to occur or there is a high chance that the contaminant will occur in public water systems often enough and at levels of public health concern; and (3) whether regulation of the contaminant presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk reductions for persons served by public water systems in the sole judgment of the EPA Administrator.

Having a proposed regulatory determination enables the EPA to solicit comments and gather information to decide whether to set the MCLs and, if so, the appropriate level for the MCLs. Following the Office of Management and Budget’s review, the EPA is expected to publish a preliminary regulatory determination in the Federal Register (FR) and provide an opportunity for public comment. After review and consideration of public comment, the EPA publishes final FR notice with the regulatory determination decisions. If the EPA makes a decision to regulate a particular contaminant, the agency starts the rulemaking process to establish the national primary drinking water regulation and MCLs.

There will be opportunities for the regulated community to monitor and have meaningful input into the regulatory determination process to come. Stay tuned for further updates.


Trudy Fisher and Laura Heusel are attorneys with Butler Snow. Visit butlersnow.com

 

 
FISCHERSCOPE® XAN® LIQUID ANALYZER
High-performace passivates
KCH Engineered Systems
Hitachi High-Tech FT200 series
Luster-On Products
Gardner Intelligence
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
The Finishing Industry’s Education and Networking Resource

Related Content

economics

Bryan Leiker, MFACA, Discusses CARB Public Hearing Over Calif. Hex Chrome Ban

Bryan Leiker, executive director, Metal Finishing Association of California, offers a recap of a January 27, 2023, public hearing conducted by the California Air Resources Board prior to an impending ruling on a proposed ban of hexavalent chromium use for finishing operations in the state.

Read More
Electroplating

How to Maximize Nickel Plating Performance

The advantages of boric acid-free nickel plating include allowing manufacturers who utilize nickel plating to keep up the ever-changing regulatory policies and support sustainability efforts.

Read More
regulation

Practical Environmental Management Reduces Costs, Refines Quality

By focusing on effluent treatment and efficient tin recovery, this Indian surface treatment plant meets stringent environmental standards and sustainable high-quality production. 

Read More
Electroplating

Hexavalent to trivalent chromium — the environmental benefits

Regulatory pressures to switch from hexavalent chromium to trivalent alternatives are a growing concern for many finishing operations. In this Products Finishing Ask the Expert clinic, Brittany McKinney of Pavco discusses the environmental considerations driving these regulations. 

Read More

Read Next

Sponsored

Delivering Increased Benefits to Greenhouse Films

Baystar's Borstar technology is helping customers deliver better, more reliable production methods to greenhouse agriculture.

Read More
Pollution Control

Episode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions

Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.

Read More
workforce development

Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining

Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.

Read More
KCH Engineered Systems