Q&A: Spray Gun Flow Rate Problem
Q. We have problems achieving consistent paint flow through our spray guns (typical rates range from 10 to 50 g/min).
Q. We have problems achieving consistent paint flow through our spray guns (typical rates range from 10 to 50 g/min). We spray small round parts up to 50 mm in diameter by mounting the parts on spindles and moving them past the spray guns using a chain-on-edge conveyor system, producing about 3-5k parts per hour. The paint is supplied pre-mixed in 2-L tins, and we pump this using a regulated diaphragm pump set at 60 psi. The paint flow is controlled by a flow regulator set at 20 psi and back pressure regulator set at about 18 psi so that the diaphragm pump runs at 3-4 sec per cycle. The fluid flows through air-operated fluid regulators to a maximum of three spray guns.
We find that the fluid flow will alter during spraying at the low flow rates. We are debating changing the fluid hose from the regulator to the gun from a 4-mm bore to 2-mm bore, the theory being that we will require more pressure for the same flow rate. The paint in question is medium solids content, approximately 40 percent, and viscosity of 78 sec using a DIN cup. K.F.
A. Following your theory of stabilizing flow rate by decreasing the hose size and increasing pressure may work. However, there may be other problems such as a faulty fluid pump, faulty regulators and out-of-adjustment gages. Differences in viscosity could also account for the flow rates. You should also consider checking the viscosity of each can of paint before adding it to your system
Rather than trying to solve this problem yourselves, however, your equipment salesman or service representative should be in your plant trying to solve it for you. When you bought the equipment you also paid for technical service, so I recommend calling the equipment supplier for help.
To read more of Carl's Q&As, please click HERE
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #120: Electrochemical Destruction of Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Electroplating Wastewaters – January – December 2023
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers quarterly reporting for the year 2023 at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The objective of this work is to utilize a cost-effective reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) for the removal of PFAS from synthetic electroplating wastewater. Discussed here are the oxidation of PFOA with three different catalysts, development of a method for detecting PFAS, as well as work on 6:2-fluorotelomersulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and electrodeposited bismuth/tin oxide catalysts.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 7th Quarterly Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on addressing the problem of PFAS and related chemicals in plating wastewater streams, studying PFAS destruction via electrooxidation and electrocoagulation. Our last report described the results from experiments of EO with a Magnéli phase Ti4O7 anode on the degradation of eight perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs). In this seven quarter report, we describe work to further explore how the degradation of different PFAAs are related to their molecular structures.
-
Hubbard-Hall Acquires BioConversion Technology
The acquisition adds experience and biologics to the AquaPure product line.