Parker Ionics Powder Equipment
Published

The Cost of Rehandling Parts

Good racking design can increase production rates and save labor costs.

Dan Davitz, industrial finishing line consultant, Prism Strategy & Design LLC

Share

racking

Davitz

Q: We are finding that we’re spending a lot of time manually handling parts and suspect it is impacting our production rates. Do you have any suggestions for streamlining operations?

Recently I had the opportunity to consult with a manufacturing company regarding improvements to their finishing line. While reviewing their processes, I noticed they were handling parts repeatedly from one station to the next. Surprisingly, after discussing various problems and solutions, the additional handling of parts was not recognized by the company as a problem to be addressed. However, there is a significant cost to touch a part in any process and it’s wise to know, as in every business, where your costs lie.

Previously, the cost to touch a part for a mid-sized finishing line was approximately $0.35. Today, the cost to operate a finishing line can be as much as $1,500 to $2,500 per hour. Items to be considered into this cost include utilities, chemicals, paint, equipment, maintenance, labor and overhead. Depending on the size of the part and the operation being performed, it can easily cost $0.60 or more each time a part is handled.

In this example, parts were individually placed into totes from multiple welding and forming stations. The totes were then unloaded manually, one part at a time, and placed into a batch washer. The parts were then removed individually from the washer and placed back into totes for staging prior to painting. Then the parts were again removed from the totes to be hung individually on single bar paint racks. After painting, the parts were removed from the racks for packaging. Ultimately, every part was placed into a tote and rehandled an additional three times more than if they had been placed onto mobile, multi-tiered racks at the first welding and forming stations. The already racked parts would then be rolled into a multiple rack batch washer designed for the job and remain on the racks through the painting process. The total number of individual parts rehandled in and out of totes would be reduced from five to two.

Based on the information specific to this company, I estimated the cost to manually handle each part to be $0.60. Therefore, the additional three rehandling operations per part, multiplied by the 650 average number of parts painted per day, amounted to an extra cost of $1,170 per day, the equivalent of over $304,000 per year. This was an unnecessary expenditure at a time when production demands were not being met, overtime was a norm, and inflation rising. 

Using racks to hold mass quantities of parts hung for automatic batch washing eliminated the old manually loaded and unloaded batch washer, a known bottleneck in the entire operation.

Transporting mobile loaded parts racks in and out of an automatic batch washer specifically designed to handle multiple racks simultaneously, would increase throughput for the entire finishing operation. These multi-tiered racks were also designed to increase parts density and production from 100% to 500% depending on the part size. The increased production generated additional cost savings over and above those achieved by eliminating the rehandling of the parts themselves.

Rack design — make it count

The design of the racks should allow the parts to be easily accessible without removal for any axillary operation such as masking, sanding, deburring, washing, draining, drying, painting and curing, eliminating the need to remove parts from totes and putting them back again. The goal is to not remove parts from the racks until they are ready for inspection and packaging.

The rack design should be modular to accommodate easy changeover for various sizes and shapes of parts maintaining maximum part density both horizontally and vertically. Hooks should be interchangeable, when possible, for different parts as well as for cleaning.

Using racks to hold and transport parts versus using totes is also ergonomically a better solution. Even when a few parts are hung on a lower tier of a rack, the handling process is still easier than bending over to pick up every part out of a tote and put it back again multiple times a day between stations.

In conclusion, racking parts efficiently and correctly from the beginning of their processing will increase production rates and save tremendous costs in labor and rehandling. Examining these concepts and designs can dramatically improve your bottom line.


Dan Davitz is an Industrial Finishing Line Consultant with over 30 years’ experience internationally, specializing in rack design.

He is Founder and Independent Consultant at Prism Strategy & Design, LLC

Info@PrismStrategyAndDesign.com

Keyland Polymer UV Cured Powder Coating
Vitracoat Inc. powder coatings
Parker Ionics
complete finishing application systems
Your Best Finish Starts With Us!
Powder Coating Institute
Steelman Industries Inc.
Filtration Systems

Related Content

Electroplating

How to Choose Between Sulfate and Chloride-Based Trivalent Chromium

There are several factors to consider when choosing between sulfate and chloride-based baths for trivalent chromium plating. Mark Schario of Columbia Chemical discusses the differences and what platers should keep in mind when evaluating options.

Read More
Ask The Expert

Surface Preparation for Best Adhesion for Powder Coating

Kevin Biller with ChemQuest recommends the proper way to prepare a surface for powder coating that leads to excellent adhesion on 304SST. 

Read More
Powder Coating

Adjusting Current and Voltage When Powder Coating

Which manual powder coating gun setting is better to adjust, voltage or current? Jeff Hale of Gema USA discusses when to use different settings on your powder gun to achieve optimal results.

Read More
basics

Prevent Plating Problems with Critical Inspections

Tanks and their contents should be regularly inspected visually and analytically. When a quality issue arises, it is important to quickly pinpoint where the main problem is by checking which parameter is out of line.

Read More

Read Next

Parts Cleaning

Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining

Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.

Read More
Parts Cleaning

A ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago

The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.   

Read More
regulation

Episode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions

Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.

Read More
UV Cured Powder Coating - Low Temps Instant Cure