The Cost of Rehandling Parts
Good racking design can increase production rates and save labor costs.
Davitz
Q: We are finding that we’re spending a lot of time manually handling parts and suspect it is impacting our production rates. Do you have any suggestions for streamlining operations?
Recently I had the opportunity to consult with a manufacturing company regarding improvements to their finishing line. While reviewing their processes, I noticed they were handling parts repeatedly from one station to the next. Surprisingly, after discussing various problems and solutions, the additional handling of parts was not recognized by the company as a problem to be addressed. However, there is a significant cost to touch a part in any process and it’s wise to know, as in every business, where your costs lie.
Previously, the cost to touch a part for a mid-sized finishing line was approximately $0.35. Today, the cost to operate a finishing line can be as much as $1,500 to $2,500 per hour. Items to be considered into this cost include utilities, chemicals, paint, equipment, maintenance, labor and overhead. Depending on the size of the part and the operation being performed, it can easily cost $0.60 or more each time a part is handled.
In this example, parts were individually placed into totes from multiple welding and forming stations. The totes were then unloaded manually, one part at a time, and placed into a batch washer. The parts were then removed individually from the washer and placed back into totes for staging prior to painting. Then the parts were again removed from the totes to be hung individually on single bar paint racks. After painting, the parts were removed from the racks for packaging. Ultimately, every part was placed into a tote and rehandled an additional three times more than if they had been placed onto mobile, multi-tiered racks at the first welding and forming stations. The already racked parts would then be rolled into a multiple rack batch washer designed for the job and remain on the racks through the painting process. The total number of individual parts rehandled in and out of totes would be reduced from five to two.
Based on the information specific to this company, I estimated the cost to manually handle each part to be $0.60. Therefore, the additional three rehandling operations per part, multiplied by the 650 average number of parts painted per day, amounted to an extra cost of $1,170 per day, the equivalent of over $304,000 per year. This was an unnecessary expenditure at a time when production demands were not being met, overtime was a norm, and inflation rising.
Using racks to hold mass quantities of parts hung for automatic batch washing eliminated the old manually loaded and unloaded batch washer, a known bottleneck in the entire operation.
Transporting mobile loaded parts racks in and out of an automatic batch washer specifically designed to handle multiple racks simultaneously, would increase throughput for the entire finishing operation. These multi-tiered racks were also designed to increase parts density and production from 100% to 500% depending on the part size. The increased production generated additional cost savings over and above those achieved by eliminating the rehandling of the parts themselves.
Rack design — make it count
The design of the racks should allow the parts to be easily accessible without removal for any axillary operation such as masking, sanding, deburring, washing, draining, drying, painting and curing, eliminating the need to remove parts from totes and putting them back again. The goal is to not remove parts from the racks until they are ready for inspection and packaging.
The rack design should be modular to accommodate easy changeover for various sizes and shapes of parts maintaining maximum part density both horizontally and vertically. Hooks should be interchangeable, when possible, for different parts as well as for cleaning.
Using racks to hold and transport parts versus using totes is also ergonomically a better solution. Even when a few parts are hung on a lower tier of a rack, the handling process is still easier than bending over to pick up every part out of a tote and put it back again multiple times a day between stations.
In conclusion, racking parts efficiently and correctly from the beginning of their processing will increase production rates and save tremendous costs in labor and rehandling. Examining these concepts and designs can dramatically improve your bottom line.
Dan Davitz is an Industrial Finishing Line Consultant with over 30 years’ experience internationally, specializing in rack design.
He is Founder and Independent Consultant at Prism Strategy & Design, LLC
Info@PrismStrategyAndDesign.com
Related Content
The Importance of Rack Maintenance
A look at how poor rack maintenance contributes to wasted time, wasted chemicals and wasted materials.
Read MoreTroubleshooting 5 Common Racking Problems for Platers
Being aware of usual issues that might occur during the plating process will prepare platers by helping them know how to avoid them all together or how to fix them if they happen.
Read MoreMaximize Your Racking Efficiency and Quality
Best practices for racking parts in surface finishing operations.
Read MoreCFS Unveils New Hook Locks Parts Racking Solution
New product from Custom Fabricating & Supplies (CFS) prevents part loss during coating processes.
Read MoreRead Next
Episode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions
Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.
Read MoreEducation Bringing Cleaning to Machining
Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.
Read MoreA ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago
The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.
Read More