EPA Criticized for Ignoring Environmental Justice Concerns in PFAS Strategic Roadmap
EPA’s National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC) claims the agency has failed to address adequately environmental justice concerns associated with PFAS in an effort to avoid another crisis similar to the lead in Flint, MI drinking water.
EPA’s environmental justice (EJ) advisors are questioning whether the agency’s strategic roadmap to address per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) does enough to protect environmental justice (EJ) communities and provide them with funding, with some comparing the situation to the lead crisis that affects drinking water in Flint, MI.
The chair of a PFAS workgroup on EPA’s National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC) recently said the panel will be providing feedback to EPA on the overarching PFAS Roadmap, including addressing what it sees as missing items ahead of a September deadline.
The NEJAC members signaled that the agency will face increased pressure to toughen its PFAS roadmap and devote more resources to address community concerns even as officials are facing blowback from utilities and Republican lawmakers over the agency’s new drinking water health advisories for PFAS set at levels lower than what can be detected.
NEJAC members compared the PFAS exposure crisis to what happened in Flint, MI, which is still addressing its lead-in-drinking water crisis that began eight years ago when the city’s water source was switched. They further noted that there are multiple types of PFAS exposure to vulnerable communities, including air, water, and waste, as well as through food and drink packaging.
In response to a presentation on PFAS strategy to the NEJAC from EPA’s water office, NEJAC members indicated that they are not seeing “enough about what is being done specifically” for EJ communities. Specifically, concerns were raised about limited funds for communities reminiscent of the events leading up to the lead crisis in Flint, MI.
Other NEJAC members raised significant concerns, including one who said that PFAS restrictions are helpful, but there is “persistent anger that government really isn’t protecting us by allowing these things to be created in the first place. . . We’re killing ourselves.”
In response to these concerns, EPA officials touted a range of actions being taken to limit exposures and remediate contamination, such as the new drinking water health advisories for PFOA, PFOS, PFBS, and GenX, the drinking water standard for PFOA and PFOS, PFAS, development of new effluent limitation guidelines for industry source categories, and the listing of PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under CERCLA.
In addition to the new drinking water health advisory levels for four PFAS, EPA also announced $1 billion in new funds authorized by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) that will be targeted “to help communities that are on the frontlines of PFAS contamination,” -- a first step toward distributing a total of $5 billion the law allocates for PFAS reductions in vulnerable communities.
Nonetheless, the EJ concerns expressed on how EPA is addressing PFAS will continue to add pressure to EPA to impose additional regulatory controls over PFAS, hold industries accountable, and show results in minimizing potential impacts of PFAS on disadvantaged communities. If you have any questions or would like additional information regarding this issue, please contact Jeff Hannapel or Christian Richter with NASF at jhannapel@thepolicygroup.com or crichter@thepolicygroup.com.
This update is courtesy of the National Association for Surface Finishing (NASF). For more information or to become a member, visit nasf.org.
Related Content
California Public Hearing to Decide Fate of Hex Chrome Plating and Anodizing
Metal Finishing Association of California urges all members of the metal finishing community to submit comments prior to the hearing.
Read MoreBryan Leiker, MFACA, Discusses CARB Public Hearing Over Calif. Hex Chrome Ban
Bryan Leiker, executive director, Metal Finishing Association of California, offers a recap of a January 27, 2023, public hearing conducted by the California Air Resources Board prior to an impending ruling on a proposed ban of hexavalent chromium use for finishing operations in the state.
Read MoreThe Future of Hard Chrome: Pioneering Innovations for Sustainable Solutions
Although useful, chromic acid and other compounds that contain hexavalent chromium ions are highly toxic and carcinogenic. However, one company has developed an alternative for the hard chrome process that achieves thick, conformal coatings with wear and fatigue resistance comparable or superior to hexavalent chromium-based systems.
Read MoreTrivalent Chrome Overview
As the finishing industry begins to move away from the use of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, what factors should finishers consider as they make new investments? Mark Schario, chief technology officer for Columbia Chemical offers a helpful overview of this complicated topic.
Read MoreRead Next
Education Bringing Cleaning to Machining
Debuting new speakers and cleaning technology content during this half-day workshop co-located with IMTS 2024.
Read MoreA ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago
The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.
Read MoreEpisode 45: An Interview with Chandler Mancuso, MacDermid Envio Solutions
Chandler Mancuso, technical director with MacDermid Envio discusses updating your wastewater treatment system and implementing materials recycling solutions to increase efficiencies, control costs and reduce environmental impact.
Read More