NASF Submits Comments to Minimize Small Business Impact of EPA Rule for the Use of N-Propyl Bromide
NASF has requested that EPA consider allowing five years to implement any restrictions on the use of n-propyl bromide for critical applications.
EPA held a meeting of the Small Business Advocacy Review (SBAR) Panel on May 11, 2021 to discuss EPA’s potential proposed rulemaking for n-propyl bromide (1-Bromopropane) under TSCA §6(a). NASF and two of its members have been designated as small entity representatives (SREs) and participated in this meeting. EPA identified unreasonable risks associated with certain conditions of use and laid out its proposed approach to impose restriction on the use on n-propyl bromide. This included setting an existing chemical exposure limit (ECEL) of 0.05 parts per million (ppm) for n-propyl bromide based primarily on calculated occupational exposure risks.
As part of this process, NASF submitted comments on EPA’s approach that is under considerations. The comments noted that the ECEL would not be achievable, even with expensive, state-of-the-art vacuum degreasers. Accordingly, facilities that must use n-propyl bromide based on customer approvals or specifications would have to switch to alternatives.
Unfortunately, while some of the available alternatives may be promising, none of them appear to be a drop-in replacement at this time due to technological and economic feasibility considerations. To avoid potentially major consequences for small surface finishing businesses, NASF requested that EPA consider allowing at least five years to implement any restrictions on the use of n-propyl bromide for critical applications. This additional time could help to reduce the potential adverse impacts of the rule on small surface finishing businesses.
The SBAR Panel will consider all of the comments (both verbal and written from the small entity representatives) on the rule and will prepare a report for the EPA Administrator on potential ways to reduce impacts to small entities that may arise from this rulemaking. Following this input, EPA will draft a proposed rule to identify management options for n-propyl bromide that protect human health and the environment and will minimize impacts on small businesses. EPA must issue a proposed rulemaking by August 2021. For more information of this process and NASF’s comments, please contact Jeff Hannapel with NASF at jhannapel@thepolicygroup.com.
This update is courtesy of the National Association for Surface Finishing (NASF). For more information or to become a member, visit nasf.org.
Related Content
-
Development of a Novel Hexavalent-Chromium-Free Aluminum Sacrificial Paint
Hexavalent chromium is a known carcinogen, repro-toxin, and mutagen. Its elimination is of high importance to the aerospace industry, which has struggled to find high performing alternatives. Legacy aluminum sacrificial paints have traditionally utilized hexavalent chromium to prevent corrosion and coatings which are equal to or better than have been difficult. This first paper discusses the novel process from the supplier point-of-view.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.
-
Looking Back: The Columnists
Many industrial/technical journals consist of a well-rounded mixture of technical papers, practical articles about technology and how-to-do-it features, including this one, Products Finishing. In its decades of publication, the AESF/NASF journal, Plating & Surface Finishing also endeavored to meet this need. Among the many features were those of the columnists, recognized experts who had expertise in certain segments of the surface finishing industry. This article contains a sampling of columns published in P&SF over the years, which still retain information of importance even today.
