PF Podcast
Published

Keeping a “No Dump” Etch in Balance

We recently have had a few racks of metal that had a galvanized, over-etched appearance. The problem was coming from the etch tank and the racks were etched the normal amount of time. Do you have any idea what could cause that appearance?

Share

Q. We recently have had a few racks of metal that had a galvanized, over-etched appearance. The problem was coming from the etch tank and the racks were etched the normal amount of time. I had never seen that before. We added some caustic and etch additive, even though the tank chemistry was in normal operating range and the problem went away. I think we lucked out. Do you have any idea what could cause that appearance? Thanks in advance. P.P.

 

A. This problem is usually related to the ratio of dissolved aluminum, the concentration of NaOH and the amount of additive, or “extender” in the bath. The additive is a sequestering agent and can hold a certain amount of dissolved aluminum in solution to keep it from “falling out” and depositing a very hard (like concrete) precipitate in the etch tank. If the NaOH concentration is near the lower limit, the additive concentration on the low side and the aluminum concentration slightly higher than normal, the bright, or rough etch can occur. Sometimes it’s called “galvanizing”.

I would think since your product is mostly stock length extrusions, the dragout of caustic would be fairly consistent. However, sometimes certain shapes drag-out a lot less than others, or operator “styles” can change from time to time. If less dragout occurs, the aluminum content will go up to levels usually not seen. If this happens when the concentrations of the other chemicals in the bath happen to be at, or near, the low limit of the operating range, then the condition you describe can occur.
Remember, that as the dissolved aluminum content rises, you need to add more caustic and “extender” to maintain a consistent etch even if this results in the NaOH concentration sometimes going above the normal control limits. Apparently you experienced first hand that the addition of caustic soda and “extender” solved the problem. I don’t know what concentration of NaOH you are running. Normally, for a so-called “architectural/commercial etch” a fairly matte finish is desired. This would dictate a new bath make-up something like this:

  • NaOH 7–8 oz/gal (x 7.5 for g/l
  • Al, 10–20 g/l minimum
  • “Extender”, 2–3% by volume (depends on the brand. Use manufacturer’s recommendations)

 

A temperature of 140°F would be fairly normal, or perhaps a little higher, with maybe a 10 minute etch. (Most large etch tanks for architectural shapes also require a cooling coil to help maintain the correct temperature). As the dissolved aluminum gets to the area of 140 g/liter, or higher, the NaOH concentration should also be increased. I’ve seen as high as 12 oz/gal (90 g/liter), or more, to maintain the desired appearance of the etching. Of course, as the NaOH rises so should the “extender” concentration.

I hope this helps. Maybe you already know all this and are following these general guidelines. My response to that would be “keep going up” on the concentrations of NaOH and “extender” until you see the desired results. It never hurts to decant the etch tank if the aluminum wants to stay above 140–150 g/liter, or higher. This is not a bad idea to do once or twice a year anyway. Or you can simply try to drag-out more solution during the transfer of loads to the rinse tank. I would say, generally speaking, that if the aluminum concentration is above 160 g/liter, you are in the danger zone.

Please let me know what you do and how you make out. 

Luster-On Products
PF Podcast
plating and surface finishing additives
find masking products online
The Finishing Industry’s Education and Networking Resource
Filtration Systems
OptiCenter All-in-One OC11
Metal Pretreatment Technology
Heatmax Heaters ad with immersion heaters
New Acid-Free Bright Nickel Process
Pretreatment Washer and Finishing Equipment
Gardner Intelligence

Related Content

regulation

Trivalent Chrome Overview

As the finishing industry begins to move away from the use of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, what factors should finishers consider as they make new investments? Mark Schario, chief technology officer for Columbia Chemical offers a helpful overview of this complicated topic.

Read More
Electroplating

Zinc Electroplating

Choosing the best process for your operation.

Read More
Anodizing

A Smooth Transition from One Anodizing Process to Another

Knowing when to switch from chromic acid anodizing to thin film sulfuric acid anodizing is important. Learn about why the change should be considered and the challenges in doing so.

Read More
Anodizing

Understanding PEO Coatings

Using high-speed cameras and back side illumination (BSI) sensor technology to analyze plasma electrolytic oxidation. 

Read More

Read Next

Parts Cleaning

A ‘Clean’ Agenda Offers Unique Presentations in Chicago

The 2024 Parts Cleaning Conference, co-located with the International Manufacturing Technology Show, includes presentations by several speakers who are new to the conference and topics that have not been covered in past editions of this event.   

Read More
Sponsored

Delivering Increased Benefits to Greenhouse Films

Baystar's Borstar technology is helping customers deliver better, more reliable production methods to greenhouse agriculture.

Read More
Sponsored

Masking Solutions for Medical Applications

According to Custom Fabricating and Supplies, a cleanroom is ideal for converting, die cutting, laminating, slitting, packaging and assembly of medical-grade products.

Read More
Bringing Powder Coating In-House, free download