U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on WOTUS
Stakeholders looking to Supreme Court for much-needed clarity on the definition of waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act.
On October 3, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case (Sackett v. EPA) that addresses the uncertain and inconsistent definition of waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The debate centers on whether CWA jurisdiction extends to: (1) a narrow definition of wetlands – specifically, whether waters that are “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing” and to the wetlands that are immediately adjacent to such waters, or (2) a broader definition of wetlands – where there is a so-called “ ‘significant nexus’ between the wetlands in question and navigable waters in a traditional sense.”
Expectations for the Supreme Court’s Approach
Most observers expect the Supreme Court to take a middle-ground approach to the expansive “significant nexus” test and the more restrictive “permanent, standing, and continuously flowing” test, and provide much needed direction for future rulemakings to define WOTUS. The Biden Administration has already indicated that it intends to wait for the Supreme Court decisions before proceeding on its new rulemaking to define WOTUS.
The Supreme Court could also apply the “major questions doctrine” that would require specific legislative authorization and direction from Congress before EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) can finalize a revised definition of WOTUS on such a high-profile rulemaking. This could further delay or complicate a new decision from EPA and the Corps until Congress provides the requisite legislative authority.
The Supreme Court decision will provide some much-needed clarity on this issue. In the meantime, the long-term future of WOTUS will remain uncertain. If you have any questions or would like additional information about the Supreme Court case and the WOTUS rulemaking, please contact Jeff Hannapel or Christian Richter with NASF at jhannapel@thepolicygroup.com or crichter@thepolicygroup.com.
This update is courtesy of the National Association for Surface Finishing (NASF). For more information or to become a member, visit nasf.org.
Related Content
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #123: Electrochemical Manufacturing for Energy Applications – 3rd Quarterly Report - Part II
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board has selected a project on electrodeposition toward developing low-cost and scalable manufacturing processes for hydrogen fuel cells and electrolysis cells for clean transportation and distributed power applications. This third quarterly report consists of Part II of a review paper, prepared and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication, covering opportunities and challenges for additive manufacturing technologies. Part I, covering the literature on additive manufacturing of SOFCs and SOECs, was published in December 2022.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #122: Electrochemical Approaches to Treatment of PFAS in Plating Wastewater - 12th Quarterly Report
This NASF-AESF Foundation research project report covers the 12th quarter of project work (October – December 2023) at the University of Georgia. In our previous report, we described our work on performance and effect of surface fluorinated Ti4O7 anodes on PFAS degradation in reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) mode. This quarter, our experiments involved utilizing porous Ti4O7 plates serving both as anodes and membranes. Tests compared pristine and F-18.6 Ti4O7 anodes at current densities of 10 mA/cm2 and 40 mA/cm2. This 12th quarterly report discusses the mechanisms of the effects on EO performance by anode surface fluorination.
-
Hexavalent-Chromium-Free Aluminum Sacrificial Paint Validation
Hexavalent chromium is a known carcinogen, repro-toxin and mutagen. Its elimination is of high importance to the aerospace industry, which has struggled to find high performing alternatives. Legacy aluminum sacrificial paints have traditionally utilized hexavalent chromium to prevent corrosion and coatings which are equal to or better than have been difficult. This second of two papers discusses the hexavalent-chromium-free process from the user point-of-view in terms of the process validation work by Rolls Royce Corporation.
